Activity Wheel Stress: Changes in Brain Norepinephrine Turnover and the Occurrence of Gastric Lesions

Rea, Michael A.; Hellhammer, Dirk H.

doi:10.1159/000287848

Cited by 17 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Noradrenergic, 38,48 histaminergic, 10 and dopaminergic 17 neuronal activity in the hypothalamus are significantly enhanced while serotonergic metabolism was decreased. 17 Additional indirect evidence for the involvement of the hypothalamus comes from the increased activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis in this model.…”

Section: The Hypothalamus and The Activity-based Anorexia Modelmentioning

confidence: 94%

Electrical stimulation in the lateral hypothalamus in rats in the activity-based anorexia model

Welkenhuysen

Kuyck²,

Das³

et al. 2008

FOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Object One quarter of patients with anorexia nervosa have a poor outcome and continue to suffer chronically or die. Electrical brain stimulation may be of therapeutic benefit in some of these patients; however, the brain target for inducing symptom relief is unknown. In this study, the authors evaluated the effects of acute and chronic electrical stimulation in the lateral hypothalamus on food intake, locomotor activity, and survival time in rats in an activity-based anorexia model. Methods In an acute experiment, the authors electrically stimulated at 100 Hz and 0, 25, 50 and 75% of the maximal stimulation amplitude (that is, the amplitude leading to severe side effects) in the lateral hypothalamus on consecutive days during 4 test sessions in 10 rats and evaluated food intake and locomotor activity. In a chronic experiment, they compared food intake, wheel revolutions, and survival time between 6 rats that underwent electrical stimulation in the lateral hypothalamus (50% of maximal stimulation amplitude) and 8 rats that did not undergo stimulation. Results In the acute experiment, overall electrical stimulation (25, 50, and 75% combined) and stimulation at 75% of the maximal stimulation amplitude significantly decreased the locomotor activity. However, if the authors omitted results of 1 rat, in which the electrode tip was not located in the lateral hypothalamus on one side but rather in the supraoptic chiasm, the remaining results did not yield significance. No other differences were observed. Conclusions When the findings of the current study are extrapolated to patients with anorexia nervosa, the authors do not expect major effects on symptoms with electrical stimulation at high frequency in the lateral hypothalamus.