2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2468-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They stated that self-regulation by norms and rules could also reduce the likelihood of more governmental regulation and place the company a better position if new laws should emerge. This fits other researchers' findings (e.g., Vogel 2005Vogel , 2009Zeyen et al 2014). The next section discusses this and other results.…”
Section: Different Manifestations Of Csrsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They stated that self-regulation by norms and rules could also reduce the likelihood of more governmental regulation and place the company a better position if new laws should emerge. This fits other researchers' findings (e.g., Vogel 2005Vogel , 2009Zeyen et al 2014). The next section discusses this and other results.…”
Section: Different Manifestations Of Csrsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While extant studies focus on green networks' effect from an institutional perspective (stressing legitimacy and reputational effects) (e.g. Zeyen et al ., ), our findings suggest that greater environmental networks sharpen firms' awareness of the pressing need for transformative solutions as well as related challenges and business opportunities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaboration typically starts among a small number of organizations, usually involving NGOs and a group of businesses who self-select to be pioneer members, either to gain reputational benefits vis-à-vis competitors or to establish a level playing field (Zeyen et al 2016). While little is known on why certain groups of stakeholders are involved in the formation of an MSP and others are not (Fransen and Kolk 2007), self-selection tends to be based on the belief that together these actors are the "right ones" to address the problem at hand (Schouten and Glasbergen 2011).…”
Section: Understanding the Governance Processes Of Mspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While little is known on why certain groups of stakeholders are involved in the formation of an MSP and others are not (Fransen and Kolk 2007), self-selection tends to be based on the belief that together these actors are the "right ones" to address the problem at hand (Schouten and Glasbergen 2011). Afterward, this pioneering group will negotiate the terms of engagement and the conditions that determine further MSP membership (Zeyen et al 2016). On the one hand, MSPs are keen to claim legitimacy based on the participation of "all categories of stakeholders" (Cheyns and Riisgaard 2014).…”
Section: Understanding the Governance Processes Of Mspsmentioning
confidence: 99%