Actor transformation in service: a process model for vulnerable consumers

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a process model for the role transformation of vulnerable consumers through support services.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on four years of participant observation at a community-based support service and in-depth interviews with the consumers. Visual ethnography was used to document the process of the consumers' role transformation through service exchanges.FindingsThe main outcome of this study is a consumer transformation model, describing consumers' role transformation processes, from recipients to generic actors. The model demonstrates that vulnerable consumers will transform from recipients to quasi-actors before becoming generic actors.Social implicationsVulnerable consumers' participation in value cocreation can be promoted by providing social support according to their dynamic roles. By enabling consumers to participate in value cocreation, social support provision can become sustainable and inclusive, especially in rural areas affected by aging and depopulation. Transforming recipients into generic actors should be a critical aim of service provision in the global challenge of aging societies.Originality/valueBeyond identifying service factors, the research findings describe the mechanism of consumers' role transformation process as a service mechanics study. Furthermore, this study contributes to transformative service research by applying social exchange theory and broadening service-dominant logic by describing the process of consumer growth for individual and community well-being.

Well-being co-creation in service ecosystems: a systematic literature review

“…In a few cases, scholars concentrate on individual actor relationships, but co-creation processes generally are addressed with a system or multilevel perspective. Similarly, the focus is rarely on individual well-being exclusively but rather gets expanded to collective (Ho and Shirahada, 2021; Tura et al , 2019), community (Ciasullo et al , 2020), system (Brodie et al , 2021) and societal well-being (Leo and Zainuddin, 2017).…”

“…In introducing the concept of consumer boosting, Bieler et al (2022) argue that service actors can intervene to enhance other actors’ resources and thereby facilitate transformative value co-creation. Moreover, Ho and Shirahada (2021) reveal that focal actors can have different roles regarding resource consumption, transmission and integration.…”

The Role of Sustainability and Innovation in Financial Services Business Transformation

“…Further, the studies can explore the situations where personal aims for well-being clash with those of society, like when aeroplane passengers object to government security regulations or people reject public health campaigns. TSR might look into how different customer groups and levels of well-being should be given priority (Ho & Shirahada, 2021). TSR, taken as a whole, is a new field in consumer and service research that can aid in comprehending and reducing the difficult issues now facing society.…”

Human Augmentation Technologies for Employee Well-Being: A Research and Development Agenda

“…Global demand for utilizing the labor force of the elderly is increasing as they account for a large proportion of the world population. Restoring their functions and supporting their employment will not only improve their well-being but also enhance the sustainability of the social system [41]. With the development of HAT, even bedridden people can now remotely operate avatar robots to serve customers [42].…”