2023
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2022.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actual status and future directions of cardiac telerehabilitation

Abstract: This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Cardiology Journal" are listed in PubMed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our study only included an intervention group without a control group that did not participate in the exercise program, our results showed improvements in various exercise parameters (peak VO 2 , MET, and peak HR) during incremental exercise tests after 2 weeks of home-based exercise programs. These ndings support previous reports highlighting that telerehabilitation offers bene ts comparable to standard rehabilitation therapy [15,[45][46][47]. Additionally, the total KASI and EQ-5D scores, which indicate the patient's activity levels and quality of life, showed a signi cant increase compared to the initial assessment and discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although our study only included an intervention group without a control group that did not participate in the exercise program, our results showed improvements in various exercise parameters (peak VO 2 , MET, and peak HR) during incremental exercise tests after 2 weeks of home-based exercise programs. These ndings support previous reports highlighting that telerehabilitation offers bene ts comparable to standard rehabilitation therapy [15,[45][46][47]. Additionally, the total KASI and EQ-5D scores, which indicate the patient's activity levels and quality of life, showed a signi cant increase compared to the initial assessment and discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%