2008
DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxn003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actualizing the "Democratic Family"? Swedish Policy Rhetoric versus Family Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We ruled this out, however, given that this is not typical of previous intergenerational studies, in which significant differences have been found between parents and children in the way they raised their offspring (see Campbell & Gilmore, , and Jung & Sterling Honig, ). Another possibility is that the second cohort, which was directly affected by laws enacting bans on corporal punishment in 1979 (see Ahlberg et al, , for a review), interpreted their parents' behavior more harshly than the previous generation. A final possibility is that the reports of the second cohort are accurate and that, like many people who find their behaviors restricted, their parents encountered psychological reactance (i.e., strong negative feelings when choice is restricted; Brehm & Brehm, ) and did not easily give up the right to discipline their children as they saw fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ruled this out, however, given that this is not typical of previous intergenerational studies, in which significant differences have been found between parents and children in the way they raised their offspring (see Campbell & Gilmore, , and Jung & Sterling Honig, ). Another possibility is that the second cohort, which was directly affected by laws enacting bans on corporal punishment in 1979 (see Ahlberg et al, , for a review), interpreted their parents' behavior more harshly than the previous generation. A final possibility is that the reports of the second cohort are accurate and that, like many people who find their behaviors restricted, their parents encountered psychological reactance (i.e., strong negative feelings when choice is restricted; Brehm & Brehm, ) and did not easily give up the right to discipline their children as they saw fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, alternating residence can be seen as a sign of social progression, where the problem, if any, is that it is not practiced often enough (Ahlberg et al . ; Williams ).…”
Section: Critical Perspectives On Alternating Residencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also an opportunity for faulty gender roles to be re-negotiated post-separation (Harris-Short 2010: 270). In this light, alternating residence can be seen as a sign of social progression, where the problem, if any, is that it is not practiced often enough (Ahlberg et al 2008;Williams 2008).…”
Section: The Swedish Development Towards Court-ordered Alternating Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammor är typiskt sett hemma med barnet under den första tiden, då barnet är mindre, vilket innebär andra krav och möjligheter än den period då pappor vanligtvis är hemma med ett något äldre barn. Det finns få studier om vilka aktiviteter som sker under föräldraledigheten, men kvalitativa studier indikerar att män använder sig av större frihet i hur de använder sin föräld-raledighet (Bekkengen 2002;Ahlberg, Roman & Duncan 2008).…”
Section: Användning Av Föräldraledighetunclassified