2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actuarial Survival Based on Gestational Age in Days at Birth for Infants Born at <26 Weeks of Gestation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely explanation is that more and more infants are delivered at a gestational age of 24 to 25 weeks, who are at greater risk for death due to gestational age itself. 18 Especially, the 60-day survival rate of surgical NEC patients in the cohort of the present study of 40% is lower than the one both Dutch and international studies report, 3 13 which might indicate more severe illness in our population. Berkhout et al estimated the NEC-associated mortality in a Dutch population of 56 extremely preterm infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW) at 21%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…A likely explanation is that more and more infants are delivered at a gestational age of 24 to 25 weeks, who are at greater risk for death due to gestational age itself. 18 Especially, the 60-day survival rate of surgical NEC patients in the cohort of the present study of 40% is lower than the one both Dutch and international studies report, 3 13 which might indicate more severe illness in our population. Berkhout et al estimated the NEC-associated mortality in a Dutch population of 56 extremely preterm infants with extremely low birth weight (ELBW) at 21%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In our case the prediction intervals were wide enough to suggest that future studies could detect no effect on tooth size from the preterm birth across gestational age groups. The possibility of no effect as suggested by the prediction intervals could possibly be related to the inclusion of the Harila-Kaera et al study [37] which assessed children born in the 1960s, when care was not as advanced as today and extremely preterm children might have less chances for survival that they exhibit nowadays [40]. Indeed, this was reflected in the higher gestational ages of the children included in the preterm groups in the abovementioned paper, compared to the other two.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessments are presented in Fig 2 . The Harila-Kaera et al study [37] involved children born in the 1960s, when medical care was not as advanced as today and babies of small gestational age and weight at birth exhibited a higher rate of mortality [40].…”
Section: Risk Of Bias In Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rates were some of the best prognoses among recent reports from highincome countries (Figure 1). [1][2][3][4][5][6] Furthermore, Miyazawa et al reported the rates of major morbidities for infants born at 22-, 23-, and 24-week gestational. 2 Figure 2 shows the results of morbidities along with those reported from the USA and Sweden.…”
Section: E D I T O R I a L The Threshold Of Viability Of Extremely Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%