2016
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actuator stiction compensation via model predictive control for nonlinear processes

Abstract: The problem of valve stiction is addressed, which is a nonlinear friction phenomenon that causes poor performance of control loops in the process industries. A model predictive control (MPC) stiction compensation formulation is developed including detailed dynamics for a sticky valve and additional constraints on the input rate of change and actuation magnitude to reduce control loop performance degradation and to prevent the MPC from requesting physically unrealistic control actions due to stiction. Although … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impacts of the process on the materials, however (for example, impacts of changes in pressure or temperature in the fluid flow on stresses or strains in the equipment), are not typically taken into account when examining the use of EMPC for a chemical process, though these impacts also can be modeled dynamically (e.g., stresses and strains can vary in both time and space in a material). Following recent work on including valve dynamics in EMPC [13], it would be desirable to consider how accounting for the behavior of materials in response to the operating policies set up by an EMPC might affect the solutions for the EMPC. In the following sections, we utilize a simple pipe flow example to explore some of the differences between traditional EMPC design thinking and EMPC accounting explicitly for material behavior.…”
Section: Accounting For Empc Impacts On Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impacts of the process on the materials, however (for example, impacts of changes in pressure or temperature in the fluid flow on stresses or strains in the equipment), are not typically taken into account when examining the use of EMPC for a chemical process, though these impacts also can be modeled dynamically (e.g., stresses and strains can vary in both time and space in a material). Following recent work on including valve dynamics in EMPC [13], it would be desirable to consider how accounting for the behavior of materials in response to the operating policies set up by an EMPC might affect the solutions for the EMPC. In the following sections, we utilize a simple pipe flow example to explore some of the differences between traditional EMPC design thinking and EMPC accounting explicitly for material behavior.…”
Section: Accounting For Empc Impacts On Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Ref. [47], a first-principles model for an ethylene oxidation process [48] coupled with a model for a valve experiencing stiction [49] is developed. Though the pressure applied to this valve by a pneumatic actuator is a function of the states and inputs (i.e., it was not itself a measured state), a constraint was imposed in the EMPC design on the pressure.…”
Section: Data-gathering Empc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performance with minimum actuator wear, is obtained when the plant main controller is aware of the actuator nonlinearity. In this regard, the current trend is achieving stiction compensation through MPC, because of its natural way to handle input constraints [18]. Furthermore, in order to ease the numerical resolution, surro-gate models of limited complexity for the actuator plus its possible local compensation strategy are added to the optimization [19].…”
Section: Literature Review and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, i.e. (18). The goal of showing this difference was just to stress out the relative importance of making the MPC aware of the external compensator.…”
Section: Simulation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%