2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acupuncture for acute musculoskeletal pain management in the emergency department and continuity clinic: a protocol for an adaptive pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Abstract: IntroductionChronic musculoskeletal pain causes a significant burden on health and quality of life and may result from inadequate treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain. The emergency department (ED) represents a novel setting in which to test non-pharmacological interventions early in the pain trajectory to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain. Acupuncture is increasingly recognised as a safe, affordable and effective treatment for pain and anxiety in the clinic setting, but it has yet to be est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sample size of 220 total subjects for Phase 1 was calculated using a minimally clinically significant difference in pain score of 1.3, 90% power and α = 5%, based on a 2-stage adaptive design with 90 subjects allocated 1:1:1 to three arms (AA+UC, PA+UC, UC) in Stage 1, and the remaining 130 subjects to two arms assuming 1:2 control:treatment allocation for Stage 2, 29,40,41 adjusted for one planned interim analysis using O’Brien-Fleming type of alpha spending function 28 and a 10% drop rate. 27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A sample size of 220 total subjects for Phase 1 was calculated using a minimally clinically significant difference in pain score of 1.3, 90% power and α = 5%, based on a 2-stage adaptive design with 90 subjects allocated 1:1:1 to three arms (AA+UC, PA+UC, UC) in Stage 1, and the remaining 130 subjects to two arms assuming 1:2 control:treatment allocation for Stage 2, 29,40,41 adjusted for one planned interim analysis using O’Brien-Fleming type of alpha spending function 28 and a 10% drop rate. 27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample size of 220 total subjects for Phase 1 was calculated using a minimally clinically significant difference in pain score of 1.3, 90% power and α = 5%, based on a 2-stage adaptive design with 90 subjects allocated 1:1:1 to three arms (AA+UC, PA+UC, UC) in Stage 1, and the remaining 130 subjects to two arms assuming 1:2 control:treatment allocation for Stage 2, 29,40,41 adjusted for one planned interim analysis using O'Brien-Fleming type of alpha spending function 28 and a 10% drop rate. 27 Primary analysis for the primary end-point was based on intention-to-treat (ITT) including all randomized subjects combined from both stages with at least one follow-up evaluation. For all outcomes, complete case analysis was conducted by excluding subjects missing the one-hour outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations