2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-011-0861-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acupuncture for Bell’s palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The evidence supporting the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating Bell's palsy is limited. The number and quality of trials are too low to form firm conclusions. Further rigorous RCTs are warranted but need to overcome the many limitations of the current evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And this is not a case-control study. A great deal of clinic study and experimental researches published in China have suggested that acupuncture is the most beneficial form of treatment for BP; however, the quality of the included trials was not up to the mark and therefore, it was not possible to draw any conclusion about the efficacy of acupuncture [18,19]. So we ignored the result of the traditional Chinese medicine for BP in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And this is not a case-control study. A great deal of clinic study and experimental researches published in China have suggested that acupuncture is the most beneficial form of treatment for BP; however, the quality of the included trials was not up to the mark and therefore, it was not possible to draw any conclusion about the efficacy of acupuncture [18,19]. So we ignored the result of the traditional Chinese medicine for BP in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…125 A meta-analysis of 6 trials also showed an 11% higher recovery rate on various scales of facial function with acupuncture plus medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone. 125 However, the GDG concurs with Chen et al, noting that due to poor randomization, insufficient blinding methods, and high risk of bias, the number and quality of trials are inadequate to draw firm conclusions despite the efforts of Chen et al to combine studies for a meta-analysis. Moreover, the GDG notes that in accordance with the work of Vickers et al, 126 most of the RCTs may reflect a selective publishing bias that clouds the generalizability of the results.…”
Section: Supporting Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different interpretations of the evidence probably reflect cultural and political differences as well as scientific ones (Bovey, 2010). Evidence is limited for Bell's palsy, conclusions cannot be drawn (Kim et al, 2011).…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 99%