2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/5381028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acupuncture for Chronic Pain-Related Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Objectives. Acupuncture has been widely used to relieve chronic pain-related insomnia (CPRI). However, the efficacy of acupuncture for CPRI is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for CPRI. Methods. Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if acupuncture was compared to sham acupuncture or conventional drug therapies for treating CPRI. Two reviewers screened each study and extracted da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The χ 2 test was used to analyze the statistical heterogeneity of the test results, assuming that the significance level of I 2 was 50%. If I 2 ≤ 50%, low heterogeneity of the research results was suggested, and the fixed effects model would be used for analysis; on the contrary, if I 2 > 50%, high heterogeneity was suggested, and the random effects model would be chosen (Liu et al, 2019). When p < 0.05, the comparison between the two was considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The χ 2 test was used to analyze the statistical heterogeneity of the test results, assuming that the significance level of I 2 was 50%. If I 2 ≤ 50%, low heterogeneity of the research results was suggested, and the fixed effects model would be used for analysis; on the contrary, if I 2 > 50%, high heterogeneity was suggested, and the random effects model would be chosen (Liu et al, 2019). When p < 0.05, the comparison between the two was considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we urgently need a relevant meta-analysis to provide reliable evidence for medical decision-making. There have been meta-analyses on acupuncture for insomnia, but they only focused on the effects of acupuncture on sleep and did not study from the perspective of acupuncture improving cognitive function in patients with insomnia [41][42][43][44][45]. Different from some studies only included in patients with comorbid insomnia [41][42][43]; this study as long as patients meet the diagnostic criteria of insomnia, whether simple insomnia or comorbid insomnia, can be included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been meta-analyses on acupuncture for insomnia, but they only focused on the effects of acupuncture on sleep and did not study from the perspective of acupuncture improving cognitive function in patients with insomnia [41][42][43][44][45]. Different from some studies only included in patients with comorbid insomnia [41][42][43]; this study as long as patients meet the diagnostic criteria of insomnia, whether simple insomnia or comorbid insomnia, can be included. Although it may increase the heterogeneity of the study, we can analyze whether acupuncture is effective for any type of insomnia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some previously published studies suggest that CBT-I, known as the first-line treatment for insomnia, and acupuncture may have different therapeutic characteristics. These studies have found that acupuncture showed weaker effects of improving insomnia itself compared to CBT-I, but showed an excellent effect in improving accompanying conditions, especially pain and painrelated insomnia (73)(74)(75)(76). Although acupuncture may still need more solid evidence to be recommended for routine treatment of elderly individuals with insomnia (77), the treatment seems to be useful as an adjuvant strategy to complement conventional treatments.…”
Section: Clinical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%