2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-020-0785-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acupuncture is ineffective for chronic low back pain? A critical analysis and rethinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with other studies that find it is almost impossible to remove the placebo effect of acupuncture through a sham acupuncture control design because there are too many factors related to the physiological activity of acupuncture, including needle insertion, psychological factors, acupuncture points, and acupuncture manipulation. 8,13,37 However, our results should be interpreted carefully because blinding of participants was not possible between the acupuncture, SATV, and SATS groups and the waiting list, and therefore the results were susceptible to nonspecific effects. In addition, in the pairwise meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in function between the SATS and waiting list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with other studies that find it is almost impossible to remove the placebo effect of acupuncture through a sham acupuncture control design because there are too many factors related to the physiological activity of acupuncture, including needle insertion, psychological factors, acupuncture points, and acupuncture manipulation. 8,13,37 However, our results should be interpreted carefully because blinding of participants was not possible between the acupuncture, SATV, and SATS groups and the waiting list, and therefore the results were susceptible to nonspecific effects. In addition, in the pairwise meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in function between the SATS and waiting list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[5][6][7] Although many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the outcomes of acupuncture on CLBP have been performed, the results continue to be controversial, and questions about the appropriateness of sham acupuncture control have been raised. 8 Accordingly, clinical practice guidelines for CLBP have promoted inconsistent recommendations on acupuncture due to a lack of what has been deemed high-quality evidence. [4][5][6][9][10][11] In RCTs evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture, it is very important to set up a physiologically inert control that has the potential to serve as a true placebo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should have a similar acupuncture response, but the exact neuroanatomical divisions here are cognitively divergent and the individual differences are great, adding more variables. The selection of control points for acupuncture research is still an unresolved issue [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the overall therapeutic effect of acupuncture may be greatly underestimated if it is compared with sham acupuncture, especially in trials that aim to evaluate the effect of acupuncture for treating pain conditions (48). Therefore, some scholars debate that the complex and multielement characteristics of acupuncture doom the design of sham acupuncture and that the great effort to control the psychological (non-specific) factors through currently available modalities of sham acupuncture might be unnecessary and unsuccessful (49). In this scenario, we do not set up a sham acupuncture group as the control in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%