Into Space - A Journey of How Humans Adapt and Live in Microgravity 2018
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute and Chronic Effects of Hypobaric Exposure upon the Brain

Abstract: Exposure to the hypobaric environment presents numerous physiological challenges to both aviators/pilots, mountain climbers and astronauts. Decompression sickness (DCS) is one of the most commonly experienced maladies and may present variably in protean fashion from mild symptoms such as the bends to severe neurological or pulmonary (i.e. chokes) symptomatology. Furthermore, exposure to extreme non-hypoxic hypobaric environments such as those experienced by our U-2 pilots, irrespective of clinical history of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although hypobaric chambers provided the initial tools to induce hypoxia, reduced oxygen breathing devices (ROBD) providing mask-on NH ( Sausen et al, 2001 ) and a combination of HH and mask-on NH (i.e., CADO; Singh et al, 2010 ) have more recently been incorporated into HRT to prevent potential adverse effects of barometric pressure reduction, such as decompression sickness ( Webb and Pilmanis, 2011 ), white matter hyperintensities ( McGuire et al, 2014 , 2019 ; Sherman and Sladky, 2018 ) and barotrauma. Additional advantages of ROBDs are their simplicity, ease of transport, reduced expense, and lower maintenance, and they can be the preferred mode of HRT for some individuals, particularly fighter pilots ( Artino et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Training and Preparing For Hypoxic Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hypobaric chambers provided the initial tools to induce hypoxia, reduced oxygen breathing devices (ROBD) providing mask-on NH ( Sausen et al, 2001 ) and a combination of HH and mask-on NH (i.e., CADO; Singh et al, 2010 ) have more recently been incorporated into HRT to prevent potential adverse effects of barometric pressure reduction, such as decompression sickness ( Webb and Pilmanis, 2011 ), white matter hyperintensities ( McGuire et al, 2014 , 2019 ; Sherman and Sladky, 2018 ) and barotrauma. Additional advantages of ROBDs are their simplicity, ease of transport, reduced expense, and lower maintenance, and they can be the preferred mode of HRT for some individuals, particularly fighter pilots ( Artino et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Training and Preparing For Hypoxic Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite these concerns, there have been no recorded cases of DCS in astronauts in pressurized space-suits during EVA, in contrast to altitude chamber technicians, who are much more prone to symptoms or signs of DCS. This might be explained by potential operational and gravitational benefits of the spaceflight upward fluid shift and pre-breathing exercise that induce faster denitrogenation ( Sherman and Sladky, 2018 ).…”
Section: Eva and Decompression Sickness (Dcs) Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral studies have shown high inter- and intra-individual variabilities in animals and humans in response to brain stimulation paradigms ( Fiske and Rice, 1955 ; Loevinger, 1957 ; López-Alonso et al, 2014 ; Wyrobek and Britten, 2016 ; Sherman and Sladky, 2018 ). These variabilities are manifested when the same subject responds differently in the ATSET if the test is done another time and may provide a potential explanation for rats with similar prescreen scores having different impairment labels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these statistical tests and plots are valuable, given the low sample size in such studies and the extent to which an affected individual score impacts the skewness of the population data, seen as the mean of the sample scores deviating significantly from their median, these averages alone likely represent an inadequate characterization of the change in the overall population performance. Furthermore, inter- and intra-individual variabilities in responses to brain stimulation paradigms ( Fiske and Rice, 1955 ; Loevinger, 1957 ; López-Alonso et al, 2014 ; Wyrobek and Britten, 2016 ; Sherman and Sladky, 2018 ) lead to inconsistent means across sample populations and disqualify their inferences on the general population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%