“…For some time, entheseal changes were thought to be indicators of occupational stress, allowing bioarchaeologists to reconstruct past lifeways and formulate conclusions about repetitive activities/work behaviour from diagnoses of robusticity and stress lesions (e.g., al‐Oumaoui, Jiménez‐Brobeil, & du Souich, ; Kennedy, ). The application of biomechanics and bone remodelling theory to entheseal changes led to the deduction that entheseal changes are created by repetitive motions producing strain on the muscle attachment sites, causing an increase in blood flow and resulting in remodelling of entheses (Lieberman, Pearson, Polk, Demes, & Crompton, ; Pathria, Chung, & Resnick, ). Formalized scoring systems, such as Hawkey and Merbs () and the new Coimbra method (e.g., Henderson, Wilczak, & Mariotti, ), have allowed researchers to capture and measure the remodelling process of bone and to make conclusions regarding the severity and, thusly thought, high level of activity in current and past populations.…”