2015
DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2015.4.20150109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute cervical cord infarction in anterior spinal artery territory with acute swelling mimicking myelitis

Abstract: Acute infarction of the cervical segment of the spinal cord is extremely uncommon. Patients may present with signs and symptoms mimicking that of acute myelitis. On imaging, both conditions may present as a hyperintense area on T-2 weighted MRI. History of sudden onset is essential in establishing the diagnosis. We report a case of cervical spinal cord infarction in a 40-year-old man who was diagnosed with acute transverse myelitis, and was treated with high dose intravenous corticosteroids followed by 5 sessi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many prior cases of SCI have demonstrated a prolonged time to nadir over many hours, including autopsy-proven cases and periprocedural SCI . The slower evolution of deficits than in cerebral infarction might be explained by diverse collateralization of spinal arterial supply with transient preservation of tissue viability before infarction, while the relatively small area of the spinal cord may also make it more susceptible to the effects of edema contributing to clinical worsening . Pain was common at presentation (72%); it may be explained by SCI activation of the spinothalamic tract or by the contributing mechanism (fibrocartilaginous embolism, artery dissection) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many prior cases of SCI have demonstrated a prolonged time to nadir over many hours, including autopsy-proven cases and periprocedural SCI . The slower evolution of deficits than in cerebral infarction might be explained by diverse collateralization of spinal arterial supply with transient preservation of tissue viability before infarction, while the relatively small area of the spinal cord may also make it more susceptible to the effects of edema contributing to clinical worsening . Pain was common at presentation (72%); it may be explained by SCI activation of the spinothalamic tract or by the contributing mechanism (fibrocartilaginous embolism, artery dissection) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,9 The slower evolution of deficits than in cerebral infarction might be explained by diverse collateralization of spinal arterial supply 10 with transient preservation of tissue viability before infarction, while the relatively small area of the spinal cord may also make it more susceptible to the effects of edema contributing to clinical worsening. 11,12 Pain was common at presentation (72%); it may be explained by SCI activation of the spinothalamic tract or by the contributing mechanism (fibrocartilaginous embolism, artery dissection). 9,13,14 Given the high proportion of older patients with vascular risk factors in our study, traditional stroke mechanisms (atherothrombosis) likely have an important role in SCI, 15 which may likely affect more proximal arteries than the spinal arteries themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of acute noncompressive myelopathy presents a challenge to clinicians, as several possible etiologies, such as vasculature, demyelination and inflammation, need to be considered in the differential diagnoses 13 . In acute noncompressive myelopathy, spinal cord infarction (SCI) could mimic neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) because of several overlaps in the clinical presentations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings 4,5 . However, the treatment and prognosis may be quite different in the two diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These locations were different from those of vascular insult to the spinal cord (spinal cord infarction), in which lesions were more frequent in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions [ 21 ]. Several reports have shown that acute spinal cord infarction may mimic myelitis [ 30 , 31 ]. From an anatomical point of view, the middle cervical cord receives its blood supply from radicular arteries fed by the extracranial vertebral artery, while the upper thoracic cord receives its blood supply from radicular arteries fed by the aorta [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%