2016
DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.171826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute corneal hydrops 3 years after Intra-corneal ring segments and corneal collagen Cross-linking

Abstract: This case report describes a 15-year-old male with allergic conjunctivitis and keratoconus, who underwent uneventful intra-corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in the right eye. During the follow-up periods, the patient was noted to have several episodes of allergic conjunctivitis that were treated accordingly. At the 2 years postoperatively, he presented with another episode of allergic conjunctivitis and progression of keratoconus was suspected on topography. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of corneal hydrops despite previous cross-linking has been reported after traditional epithelium-off treatment in two patients whom we could identify 9,10 . There is also a report of one case of mild corneal hydrops after accelerated, transepithelial cross-linking using the same protocol that we describe in this report and that also occurred at 3.5 years after the procedure 11 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of corneal hydrops despite previous cross-linking has been reported after traditional epithelium-off treatment in two patients whom we could identify 9,10 . There is also a report of one case of mild corneal hydrops after accelerated, transepithelial cross-linking using the same protocol that we describe in this report and that also occurred at 3.5 years after the procedure 11 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The development of corneal hydrops despite previous crosslinking has been reported after traditional epithelium-off treatment in two patients whom we could identify. 9,10 There is also a report of one case of mild corneal hydrops after accelerated, transepithelial cross-linking using the same protocol that we describe in this report and that also occurred at 3.5 years after the procedure. 11 The major differences between our case and the previously reported case are that the previous case did not experience significant corneal flattening after the procedure, and a more shallow demarcation line was measured on ocular coherence tomography (153 μm), suggesting a more superficial treatment in that case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…26 It has been hypothesized that stimulation of anterior stromal cell apoptosis due to eye rubbing results in secondary increase of inflammatory mediators, which potentially induce further progression and subsequent occurrence of hydrops. 26 Therefore, a more aggressive control of hypersensitivity triggers, preventing continuation of eye rubbing and arresting allergy, seems advisable for KC eyes in general, also after treatment. 27,28 It should be noted that although the total cohort in this current long-term study is larger than in the previously reported BL inlay studies, the relatively small sample size of group 2 may have limited the power of our statistical analyses and comparison between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corneal edema within 1 week of INTACS implantation has been reported and hypothesized to be related to the induction of endothelial dysfunction by the femtosecond laser used to create the INTACS stromal tunnel [ 5 , 6 ]. Antonios et al report the only instance of significantly delayed corneal hydrops or edema with the concurrent presence of an INTACS device was in a patient with severe recurring allergic keratoconjunctivitis and keratoconus who underwent CXL and INTACS implantation 3 years prior [ 7 ]. There was no evidence of INTACS migration or corneal perforation, and the presence of the INTACS ring appears coincidental rather than causal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%