2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2013.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute coronary syndrome of paradoxical origin

Abstract: We describe a rare case of acute myocardial infarction secondary to paradoxical embolism complicating acute pulmonary embolism. A 44-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with chest pain. The physical examination was unremarkable except for oxygen saturation of 75%, and the electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads. Urgent coronary angiography showed a distal occlusion of the right coronary artery and multiple thrombi were aspirated. Despite relief of chest pain and ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that most patients with paradoxical coronary embolism presented with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction rather than non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, and the infarct territory involved mainly inferior or posterior left ventricular wall 53 . While previous studies revealed that most coronary emboli lodged in the LAD artery, 54 we found that in most cases of presumed PFO‐mediated coronary paradoxical embolism, the emboli were located in a distal or branch segment of the right coronary artery (RCA), followed by the left circumflex artery (LCX), and least in the LAD 55–57 . For example, Ghafoor et al 55 .…”
Section: Patent Foramen Ovalementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that most patients with paradoxical coronary embolism presented with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction rather than non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, and the infarct territory involved mainly inferior or posterior left ventricular wall 53 . While previous studies revealed that most coronary emboli lodged in the LAD artery, 54 we found that in most cases of presumed PFO‐mediated coronary paradoxical embolism, the emboli were located in a distal or branch segment of the right coronary artery (RCA), followed by the left circumflex artery (LCX), and least in the LAD 55–57 . For example, Ghafoor et al 55 .…”
Section: Patent Foramen Ovalementioning
confidence: 73%
“…53 While previous studies revealed that most coronary emboli lodged in the LAD artery, 54 we found that in most cases of presumed PFO-mediated coronary paradoxical embolism, the emboli were located in a distal or branch segment of the right coronary artery (RCA), followed by the left circumflex artery (LCX), and least in the LAD. [55][56][57] For example, Ghafoor et al 55 described a 33-year-old woman with acute inferior myocardial infarction presenting with occlusion of the distal RCA on coronary angiography due to coronary paradoxical embolism secondary to PFO. In another study by Wilson et al, 58 a 28-year-old man with AMI and coronary paradoxical embolism in the branch of the LCX secondary to PFO was reported.…”
Section: Pfo and Myocardial Infarctionmentioning
confidence: 99%