2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute effects of brain-responsive neurostimulation in drug-resistant partial onset epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delayed stimulation is a drawback of current closed-loop DBS, because this is based on detection of abnormal brain activity within a sliding window, using complex signal processing methods [57, 58]. To enable real-time feedback operation of the bridge, early detection of interictal events is here achieved with a simple amplitude threshold-crossing approach, and triggers the stimulation within one sampling interval (see online methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delayed stimulation is a drawback of current closed-loop DBS, because this is based on detection of abnormal brain activity within a sliding window, using complex signal processing methods [57, 58]. To enable real-time feedback operation of the bridge, early detection of interictal events is here achieved with a simple amplitude threshold-crossing approach, and triggers the stimulation within one sampling interval (see online methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it still relies on arbitrary settings defined by trial-and-error, and it is primarily designed to halt rather than prevent seizures. In addition, delayed stimulation is a drawback of current closed-loop DBS, because this is based on detection of abnormal brain activity within a sliding window, using complex signal processing methods [37,38]. As a result, the median seizure reduction rate reported by follow-up evaluations is a remarkable yet improvable 51%-70% [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more patients with insular epilepsy are implanted with the NeuroPace RNS system, it might be possible to study acute as well as long-term insular stimulation-induced icEEG changes and correlate them with long-term outcomes. In a recent retrospective study, Rønborg and colleagues found that patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy treated with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation showed an acute stimulation-related reduction in iEEG spectral power, which was associated with reductions in clinical seizure frequency [ 30 ]; however, because most patients had mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, it is unlikely that the insula was stimulated in a significant number of patients in the aforementioned study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%