Acute Effects of High-intensity Resistance Exercise on Cognitive Function

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of an acute bout of high-intensity resistance exercise on measures of cognitive function. Ten men (Mean ± SD: age = 24.4 ± 3.2 yrs; body mass = 85.7 ± 11.8 kg; height = 1.78 ± 0.08 m; 1 repetition maximum (1RM) = 139.0 ± 24.1 kg) gave informed consent and performed a high-intensity 6 sets of 10 repetitions of barbell back squat exercise at 80% 1RM with 2 minutes rest between sets. The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) was completed to assess various cognitive domains during the familiarization period, immediately before, and immediately after the high-intensity resistance exercise bout. The repeated measures ANOVAs for throughput scores (r·m-1) demonstrated significant mean differences for the Mathematical Processing task (MTH; p < 0.001, η2p = 0.625) where post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the post-fatigue throughput (32.0 ± 8.8 r·m-1) was significantly greater than the pre-fatigue (23.8 ± 7.4 r·m-1, p = 0.003, d = 1.01) and the familiarization throughput (26.4 ± 5.3 r·m-1, p = 0.024, d = 0.77). The Coded Substitution-Delay task also demonstrated significant mean differences (CDD; p = 0.027, η2p = 0.394) with post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrating that the post-fatigue throughput (49.3 ± 14.4 r·m-1) was significantly less than the pre-fatigue throughput (63.2 ± 9.6 r·m-1, p = 0.011, d = 1.14). The repeated measures ANOVAs for reaction time (ms) demonstrated significant mean differences for MTH (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.624) where post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the post-fatigue reaction time (1885.2 ± 582.8 ms) was significantly less than the pre-fatigue (2518.2 ± 884.8 ms, p = 0.005, d = 0.85) and familiarization (2253.7 ± 567.6 ms, p = 0.009, d = 0.64) reaction times. The Go/No-Go task demonstrated significant mean differences (GNG; p = 0.031, η2p = 0.320) with post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrating that the post-fatigue (285.9 ± 16.3 ms) was significantly less than the pre-fatigue (298.5 ± 12.1 ms, p = 0.006, d = 0.88) reaction times. High-intensity resistance exercise may elicit domain-specific influences on cognitive function, characterized by the facilitation of simple cognitive tasks and impairments of complex cognitive tasks.

The effects of a 6-week controlled, hypocaloric ketogenic diet, with and without exogenous ketone salts, on cognitive performance and mood states in overweight and obese adults

“…The ANAM battery of cognitive tests was chosen based on previous evidence that it is a valid and reliable tool to assess cognitive function in military adult population (Levinson et al, 2005;Reeves et al, 2007). Our group recently established that high-intensity resistance exercise may elicit domain-specific influences on cognitive function utilizing the ANAM core test battery (Anders et al, 2021). Performance in several tests were improved throughout the 6-week study, showing familiarization, and learning of specific tasks.…”

Cognitive Benefits of Exercise: Is There a Time-of-Day Effect?

“…It is important to emphasize that physical exercise should be moderate [ 9 ], since high-intensity exercise may depress cognitive abilities [ 74 , 75 ]. Our results obtained from the Borg scale, a measure of perceived exertion and dyspnea associated with exercise, constitute an indirect measure of exercise intensity, which was perceived in average terms by both groups as having a light to hard intensity, and not being very hard.…”

Acute effects of aerobic versus resistance exercises on cognitive function in individuals with intellectual disability

“…However, no study was conducted to investigate the effect of RE on RT or to compare the effects of these different exercise modalities in these individuals. In individuals with TD, both AE (Anders et al, 2021; Hsieh, Chang, Fang, & Hung, 2016) and RE (Kendall et al, 2021: Formenti et al, 2020) have been shown to produce RT enhancement. Although the explicative mechanisms were not explored in the current study, according to the literature, several explanations were proposed.…”