Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation T he prognostic implications of the diagnosis of ischemia vary dramatically in different clinical ischemic syndromes. At one extreme end, in unstable angina, the detection of ischemia indicates the persistence or recurrence of instability and hence carries much more severe prognostic implications than in chronic stable angina. At the other extreme, in patients with microvascular angina, the detection of ischemia does not indicate an increased risk of infarction or sudden cardiac death and becomes clinically relevant only if its causes can be understood and effectively treated.A typical condition in which the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia is difficult is the so-called cardiac syndrome X. This syndrome, which includes 60% to 70% of women (about 60% postmenopausal and 40% premenopausal) but also 30% to 40% of men, is characterized by angina pectoris and normal coronary angiography. Its incidence may vary from 10% to 50% of patients submitted to coronary arteriography.Such broad inclusion criteria confuse the issue because of the likely inclusion of heterogeneous patients with and without a cardiac origin of pain. The selection of patients who present with specific patterns of clinical symptoms and with transient ischemic ECG changes during chest pain would lead to more homogeneous subgroups, inasmuch as the association of anginal pain with transient ECG changes indicates a cardiac, although not necessarily ischemic, origin of pain. Moreover, distinct patterns of clinical presentation might correspond with different specific pathogenetic mechanisms. 1