2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2752356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Health Shocks and Labour Market Outcomes

Abstract: We investigate the labour supply response to acute health shocks experienced in the postcrash labour market by individuals of working age, using data from Understanding Society. Identification exploits uncertainty in the timing of an acute health shock, defined by the incidence of cancer, stroke, or heart attack. Results, obtained through a combination of coarsened exact and propensity score matching, show acute health shocks significantly reduce participation, with younger workers displaying stronger labour m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental health disorders, for instance, raise the likelihood of unemployment and work absenteeism, and atrophied productivity and earnings in long-run (Banerjee, Chatterji, and Lahiri, 2017). Reduced labor supply and job market exit are reported both in the short-and long-runs after stroke and heart attack (Jones, Rice, and Zantomio, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental health disorders, for instance, raise the likelihood of unemployment and work absenteeism, and atrophied productivity and earnings in long-run (Banerjee, Chatterji, and Lahiri, 2017). Reduced labor supply and job market exit are reported both in the short-and long-runs after stroke and heart attack (Jones, Rice, and Zantomio, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Jones at al. [23] find that there is no reduction in hours of work in the year directly after the health shock for either fulltime or part-time workers. They do, however, find a reduction of approximately 2.5 hours in the subsequent year.…”
Section: Why Are These Results Important?mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Regarding previous studies, the negative effect that health shocks have on employment outcomes have been well documented throughout the world. Evidence from the U.S. [10]; [11]; [12]; [13]; [14]; [15], Australia [16], Canada [17], Denmark [12], Germany [18], the Netherlands [19], Spain [20], the UK [21]; [22]; [23]; [24], and Europe as a whole [25]; [26], shows that health shocks have negative consequences for the probability of working, hours of work, and personal finances. While the definition of a health shock varies greatly by study, a common measure is to define it as suffering from an acute health event such as cancer, heart problems, lung disease, or stroke 1 .…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In addition, our identification of high-risk subgroups may assist in targeting interventions, policies and legislation to promote return to work, [23][24][25] which itself is associated with well-being and life satisfaction among those having these health events. 26 Previous studies have attempted to quantify labour market outcomes associated with acute MI, 27-32 stroke 28,29,[33][34][35][36] and cardiac arrest 37 but had substantial methodological limitations. We and others 28 observed declines over time in employment and earnings among unexposed controls, which is relevant because most previous studies have lacked such controls, leading to a possible overestimation of effects attributable to the health events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 3 studies that included unexposed controls, 1 was a single-centre study of stroke. 33 The other 2 assessed combined cohorts of acute MI and stroke, 28 or acute MI, stroke and cancer, 29 making interpretation difficult given the large difference in labour market outcomes we observed between those 2 health events. In the previous study most comparable to ours, Fadlon and Nielsen applied matched difference-in-difference analysis to a population-based sample of 92 000 survivors of either acute MI or stroke in Denmark over 31 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%