2020
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Impact of the Use of a Standing Desk on Appetite Sensations and Energy Intake

Abstract: Background: Sedentariness has been shown to increase energy intake and is associated with increased obesity prevalence. Active workstations are used to implement physical activity interventions in workplaces, but it is unclear if they can lead to reductions in body weight. This study aims to observe the acute impact of a standing desk on energy intake and appetite sensations. Methods: Participants came to the laboratory, where they were randomly assigned to a seated or a standing desk. They completed a work se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the present results, the substitution of 4 h of sitting per day with standing may result in an additional 38.4 kcal/day in energy expenditure, predicting a loss of 1.6 kg of body fat mass in one year. Moreover, the use of a standing desk has been shown to have no effect on subsequent energy consumption [24]. Therefore, replacing the sitting position with the standing position may prevent and attenuate obesity based on the principle of energy balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the present results, the substitution of 4 h of sitting per day with standing may result in an additional 38.4 kcal/day in energy expenditure, predicting a loss of 1.6 kg of body fat mass in one year. Moreover, the use of a standing desk has been shown to have no effect on subsequent energy consumption [24]. Therefore, replacing the sitting position with the standing position may prevent and attenuate obesity based on the principle of energy balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%