2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Intramural Hematoma of the Descending Aorta Treated with Stent Graft Repair Is Associated with a Better Prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IMHB without obvious mal‐perfusion syndrome is always regarded as a benign disease because of the good outcome. In our study, the more aggressive therapy group had similar mortality as previous studies (2.5% vs 0%, Ye et al; 2.5% vs 0%, Bischoff et al). Li et al and Zhang et al also reported good outcomes of prophylactic TEVAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…IMHB without obvious mal‐perfusion syndrome is always regarded as a benign disease because of the good outcome. In our study, the more aggressive therapy group had similar mortality as previous studies (2.5% vs 0%, Ye et al; 2.5% vs 0%, Bischoff et al). Li et al and Zhang et al also reported good outcomes of prophylactic TEVAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Bischoff et al reported that patients with larger ascending aorta diameters had a worse clinical outcome. Ye et al also suggested that patients with larger aortic diameters (>45 mm) and higher hematoma thicknesses (>10 mm) should be classified as “complicated” and receive more aggressive TEVAR to prevent the progression of hematoma …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Moreover, Bischoff et al also reported similar geometrical changes and worse clinical outcomes in unstable cases. Furthermore, Ye et al suggested that these unstable patients should be classified as “complicated” and treated with prophylactic TEVAR to prevent progression of the hematoma . Another potential explanation is that some patients in the no‐FID group had an FID before its final development to dissection or complete absorption but that the CTA examinations may have failed to capture this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Should these patients have undergone prophylactic TEVAR once an FID had been demonstrated and while the symptoms were controllable? Advocators of performing prophylactic TEVAR once an FID appears have reported better outcomes . In addition, TEVAR would change the geometry of the aorta and affect the survival of patients with a large diameter ascending aorta ( > 4 cm) who would be more likely to develop retrograde type A aortic dissection after TEVAR (42.4 ± 4.1 mm in the FID group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%