2016
DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s110428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: clinical expressions, therapeutic insights, and role of computed tomography

Abstract: The diagnostic approach of patients with suspected acute diverticulitis remains debated. On the one hand, a scoring system with the best predictive value in diagnosing acute diverticulitis has been developed in order to reduce the use of computed tomography (CT) scan, while, on the other hand, patients with a high probability of acute diverticulitis should benefit from CT scan from a clinical viewpoint, ensuring that they will receive the most appropriate treatment. The place and classification of CT scan for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first three statements confirm the important predicting value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in define the presence and the severity of acute diverticulitis [47,48], and that fecal calprotectin (FC) may be useful in differentiating between SUDD and IBS [35]. The forth statement confirms that the contrast-enhanced computer tomography is the gold standard to pose the diagnosis of AD and its complications [49]. The statements 3.5-3.8 underscore the increasing role of the intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in diagnosis both SUDD and AD, underscoring also the limit of this technique, namely that it operator-sensitive [50][51][52].…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The first three statements confirm the important predicting value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in define the presence and the severity of acute diverticulitis [47,48], and that fecal calprotectin (FC) may be useful in differentiating between SUDD and IBS [35]. The forth statement confirms that the contrast-enhanced computer tomography is the gold standard to pose the diagnosis of AD and its complications [49]. The statements 3.5-3.8 underscore the increasing role of the intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in diagnosis both SUDD and AD, underscoring also the limit of this technique, namely that it operator-sensitive [50][51][52].…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…CT is a significant predictor of surgery during the first attack, the presence of extraintestinal gas ≥5 mm being correlated with unfavourable outcome of nonsurgical treatment [34]. Length of involved colon >5 cm and retroperitoneal abscess were associated with diverticulitis recurrence: distant intraperitoneal air is the most important factor predicting surgical treatment [35,36]. CT colonography (CTC) recently has been proposed as a diagnostic test in patients recovering from an episode of AD; CTC should be performed at least 2 or 3 months after the acute episode of diverticulitis.…”
Section: Computer Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambrosetti [22] proposed a revised CT classification in 2013 where he defined stage 1 as uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, stage 2 as complicated acute diverticulitis, and stage 3 as complicated chronic diverticulitis with either fistula or stenosis. He further concluded that imaging not only confirms the diagnosis but appropriately stages the severity of disease in order to best guide therapeutic interventions and assess the risk of recurrence [22].…”
Section: Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%