Within a two year period in the 1940's, two Boston physicians published dramatically opposing views on the underlying nature of a syndrome now known as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Evans suggested, in several papers in [1946][1947], that sympathetic reflexes maintain pain and dystrophy in affected limbs. Foisie, in 1947, suggested arterial vasospasms were key in the etiology of this pain syndrome. Evans' hypothesis established the nomenclature for this syndrome for 60 years, and his term "reflex sympathetic dystrophy" guided clinical treatment and research activities over the same period. Foisie's proposed nomenclature was unrecognized, and had virtually no impact on the field. Recent evidence suggests that Evans' contribution to the field may have in fact lead clinicians and researchers astray all those years. This focus article on CRPS compares recent observations with these 2 earlier theories and asks the question --what if we had adopted Foisie's nomenclature from the beginning?