2014
DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in low and middle-income countries

Abstract: The experience in low-income countries shows that a structured approach to the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia results in improved survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to observations from studies in other low–middle income countries (LMIC) and prior studies from India, our results confirm there are broadly three reasons for poor outcome of children with acute leukemias; treatment abandonment, relapses, and toxic deaths. [ 6 22 23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to observations from studies in other low–middle income countries (LMIC) and prior studies from India, our results confirm there are broadly three reasons for poor outcome of children with acute leukemias; treatment abandonment, relapses, and toxic deaths. [ 6 22 23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, the overall survival (OS) with risk-directed treatment is 90% [1]. Cure rates are inferior in low-income countries, where the majority of children with ALL live [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These resource limitations may be addressed with a focus on capacity building through collaborative efforts . For example, twinning programs, which are based on partnering and interaction between hospitals in developing countries and cancer centers in developed countries, have improved survival and outcomes for pediatric cancer patients in developing countries . Despite the success of twinning programs, this approach has not been specifically applied in the context of high‐risk neuroblastoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%