2007
DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200704000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Midshaft Clavicular Fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
108
0
29

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
108
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Surgery should also be considered for fractures which are grossly displaced and severely comminuted as they have propensity to land up in non union [ Table 5]. 22,23 Recent studies which have compared conservative with operative treatment of displaced midshaft fracture clavicle, have documented better union rates and early functional return with fixation and association of malunion and non union with conservative treatment [ Table 6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Surgery should also be considered for fractures which are grossly displaced and severely comminuted as they have propensity to land up in non union [ Table 5]. 22,23 Recent studies which have compared conservative with operative treatment of displaced midshaft fracture clavicle, have documented better union rates and early functional return with fixation and association of malunion and non union with conservative treatment [ Table 6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos résultats démontrent une faible corrélation entre les mesures du raccourcissement obtenues par radiographie et par TDM dans la FTMD aiguë. 3,4 Data presented in recent literature suggest that nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (DMCFs) leads to a higher incidence of nonunion than previously reported as well as reduced shoulder strength and endurance. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Poor functional outcome has been associated with nonoperatively treated fractures that result in an overall clavicle length 15-20 mm shorter than the contralateral (unfractured) clavicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] Poor functional outcome has been associated with nonoperatively treated fractures that result in an overall clavicle length 15-20 mm shorter than the contralateral (unfractured) clavicle. 3,11,12 Consequently, 20 mm of shortening has evolved as a relative indication for operative therapy. 3,13,11 The literature that has established 20 mm of shortening as a relative indication for surgical management of DMCF is the product of multiple studies that use different measurement modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Fractures of the midshaft account for approximately 80% of all clavicular fractures because the junction between the lateral and middle third is the thinnest portion of the bone and lacks muscular and ligamentous reinforcement. 2,3 Historically, fractures of the middle third of the clavicle were managed nonoperatively because closed treatment was believed to yield a low nonunion rate and minimal functional impairment. 4 In addition, clavicular malunion, which occurs to some degree in approximately two-thirds of midshaft clavicle fractures, was previously described as being solely a radiographic anomaly with no clinical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%