2009
DOI: 10.1002/mus.21305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute motor response following a single IVIG treatment course in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Abstract: In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), the acute motor response following withdrawal and reestablishment of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy was studied. In a prospectively designed case series 11 CIDP patients in IVIG maintenance therapy were assessed with isokinetic dynamometry, nerve conduction studies, and functional tests. After short-term withdrawal of IVIG, eight treatment-responsive patients had a 14.2% (8.6-20.0) loss of isokinetic strength of 12 muscle groups. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both treatments provided significant, but not significantly different, improvements at 2 weeks in the primary outcome measure, the 11-point Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and More improvement on IVIg than on steroids Merkies et al [2] 2002 CIDP, PDN Cross-sectional 31 Lower than in controls; Improvement with treatment Padua et al [6] 2004 CIDP, MMN Prospective cohort 11 Improvement with IVIg Padua et al [7] 2005 CIDP, MMN Prospective cohort 11 Improvement with IVIg Garssen et al [8] 2004 CIDP Interventional: Physical Training 4 Improvement with training Hughes et al [9] 2008 CIDP Therapeutic 117 Improvement with IVIg Merkies et al [10] 2009 CIDP Therapeutic 117 Improvement with IVIg Merkies et al [11] 2010 CIDP Therapeutic 117 Correlation with strength, grip, disability Harbo et al [12] 2008 CIDP Cross-sectional 14 Impairment; Correlation with isokinetic strength Harbo et al [13] 2009 CIDP Therapeutic 11 Improvement with IVIg Harbo et al [14] 2009 MMN Therapeutic 9 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Eftimov et al [15] 2009 MMN Therapeutic 10 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Misbah et al [16] 2011 MMN Therapeutic 8 Improvement on SCIg Cocito et al [17] 2012 CIDP Therapeutic 5 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Cocito et al [18] 2013 CIDP Therapeutic 10 Improved with 20% SCIg compared to 16% SCIg Braine et al [19] 2012 MMN Therapeutic 16 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Nobile-Orazio et al [20] 2012 CIDP Therapeutic 45 IV Steroids equivalent to IVIg Mahdi-Rogers et al [21] 2014 CIDP, MMN, PDN Economic, HRQoL 106 Impaired compared to average Unrelated to treatment received Maxwell et al [22] 2013 CIDP, PDN HRQoL, Social 39 Impaired compared to normal dos Santos et al [23] 2014 CIDP HRQoL, cognitive 41 Impaired compared to non-matched normal subjects Niermeijer et al [24] 2007 PDN Therapeutic 35 Improved with cyclophosphamide + prednisone Léger et al [25] 2013 PDN (anti-MAG neuropathy only) Therapeutic 54…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both treatments provided significant, but not significantly different, improvements at 2 weeks in the primary outcome measure, the 11-point Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and More improvement on IVIg than on steroids Merkies et al [2] 2002 CIDP, PDN Cross-sectional 31 Lower than in controls; Improvement with treatment Padua et al [6] 2004 CIDP, MMN Prospective cohort 11 Improvement with IVIg Padua et al [7] 2005 CIDP, MMN Prospective cohort 11 Improvement with IVIg Garssen et al [8] 2004 CIDP Interventional: Physical Training 4 Improvement with training Hughes et al [9] 2008 CIDP Therapeutic 117 Improvement with IVIg Merkies et al [10] 2009 CIDP Therapeutic 117 Improvement with IVIg Merkies et al [11] 2010 CIDP Therapeutic 117 Correlation with strength, grip, disability Harbo et al [12] 2008 CIDP Cross-sectional 14 Impairment; Correlation with isokinetic strength Harbo et al [13] 2009 CIDP Therapeutic 11 Improvement with IVIg Harbo et al [14] 2009 MMN Therapeutic 9 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Eftimov et al [15] 2009 MMN Therapeutic 10 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Misbah et al [16] 2011 MMN Therapeutic 8 Improvement on SCIg Cocito et al [17] 2012 CIDP Therapeutic 5 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Cocito et al [18] 2013 CIDP Therapeutic 10 Improved with 20% SCIg compared to 16% SCIg Braine et al [19] 2012 MMN Therapeutic 16 SCIg equivalent to IVIg Nobile-Orazio et al [20] 2012 CIDP Therapeutic 45 IV Steroids equivalent to IVIg Mahdi-Rogers et al [21] 2014 CIDP, MMN, PDN Economic, HRQoL 106 Impaired compared to average Unrelated to treatment received Maxwell et al [22] 2013 CIDP, PDN HRQoL, Social 39 Impaired compared to normal dos Santos et al [23] 2014 CIDP HRQoL, cognitive 41 Impaired compared to non-matched normal subjects Niermeijer et al [24] 2007 PDN Therapeutic 35 Improved with cyclophosphamide + prednisone Léger et al [25] 2013 PDN (anti-MAG neuropathy only) Therapeutic 54…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In another analysis, Harbo et al evaluated the acute motor response following a single IVIg treatment course in 11 patients with CIDP [13]. Various assessment tools were used, including isokinetic strength, NIS (neuropathy impairment score)-strength score, functional tests such as the nine-hole peg test and 40-metre walk test, and in addition, the SF-36 Questionnaire.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a smaller study involving 11 patients on IVIG maintenance therapy, a clear increase in the strength of various muscle groups as measured with isokinetic dynamometry was observed following reinitiation of IVIG therapy after a short-term withdrawal [24]. Response was maximal between days 5 and 10 after the course of IVIG therapy, with no further improvement beyond day 15.…”
Section: • Markers Of Treatment Response In Cidpmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…NIS + 7 has, and is, the primary or co-primary outcome measure in the trials of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy [23,29], TTR FAP [10,11,13] and other generalized sensorimotor polyneuropathies [30][31][32][33][34]. The Kumamoto scale was a secondary outcome measure in the Diflunisal Trial [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%