1998
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/109.1.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Minimal Differentiation:A Multiple Parameter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,[5][6][7]11,28,31 In this study, no consistent chromosomal abnormality was detected within the AML-M0 cohort, though cytogenetic data were limited. The classic favorable AML translocations (those involving CBF, including t(8;21), and inv 16 ), present in more than 20% of non-M0 AML patients, were not present in any AML-M0 patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2,3,[5][6][7]11,28,31 In this study, no consistent chromosomal abnormality was detected within the AML-M0 cohort, though cytogenetic data were limited. The classic favorable AML translocations (those involving CBF, including t(8;21), and inv 16 ), present in more than 20% of non-M0 AML patients, were not present in any AML-M0 patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In one study, reported that the median age for 128 patients with AML was 67 years (range, 18 to 94) (Lerch et al, 2009). Other study, showed the median age of 17 patients with AML-M0 was 62 years that patients were male (Cohen et al, 1998). Data on 184 patients [MDS and AML], showed a the median age of 71.6 years (range, 29-92 years) (Merkel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…CD13 and CD33 are the most sensitive myeloid markers. The assigning of myeloid lineage relies on identifying the expression of antigens characteristic of early myelomonocytic differentiation, including CD13, CD15, CD33, CD64, CD117, and cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (Bain BJ et al, 2002;Chang CC et al, 2000;Cohen PL et al 1998;Craig FE & Foon KA, 2008;Wood BL, 2007). CD64 is expressed in AML subtypes M0 to M5 in varying intensities: strong expression characterizes AML M5, whereas heterogeneous, dim, or moderate expression is seen in M0 through M4 subtypes.…”
Section: Hla-dr In Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%