2002
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2251011282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain in Adult Patients: Abdominal Radiography Compared with CT Evaluation

Abstract: Saba senegalensis (SS) is a well-known and commonly eaten fruit in Western Africa, especially in the rainy season when it is abundant. The ingestion of its seeds may cause abdominal pain and bowel obstruction. This cause might not be recognized by radiologists who are not aware of SS CT features. We thus present the characteristic CT features of SS as found in patients presenting with abdominal pain and incidentally in others. We also discuss the differential diagnosis with the cowries (ornament) and other sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
12

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
79
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the diagnostic yield of plain abdominal radiographs remains low. Thus, abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan is used almost routinely 20 . Pneumatosis intestinalis, readily identified on CT scan, suggests bowel necrosis and impending perforation 21 .…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diagnostic yield of plain abdominal radiographs remains low. Thus, abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan is used almost routinely 20 . Pneumatosis intestinalis, readily identified on CT scan, suggests bowel necrosis and impending perforation 21 .…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the patients (33/140) were in age group of [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Years with mean age as 33.92±17.40 years (Table 1). Male to female ratio is 1.12 with 74 males and 66 females ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite being a first-line investigation in this scenario, abdominal radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific, 4,5 and cross-sectional imaging such as computed tomography (CT) is preferred.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%