2019
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score – the Clinical Predictor in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: SUMMARY The APACHE II scoring system is approved for its benchmarking and mortality predictions, but there are only a few articles published to demonstrate it in neurosurgical patients. Therefore, this study was performed to acknowledge this score and its predictive performance to hospital mortality in a tertiary referral neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU). All patients admitted to the Neurosurgical ICU from February 1 to July 31, 2011 were recruited. The parameters indicated in APACHE II score… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, there is an urgent demand for better identification of variables for high-risk patients. At present, the determination of ICU patient risk mainly relies on clinical judgment and severity scores (such as APACHE scores), which incorporate patients' previous health statuses, along with clinical and laboratory variables, which track the function of multiple organ systems [13][14][15][16]. In recent decades, our knowledge of the biochemical processes underlying critical illness has considerably improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is an urgent demand for better identification of variables for high-risk patients. At present, the determination of ICU patient risk mainly relies on clinical judgment and severity scores (such as APACHE scores), which incorporate patients' previous health statuses, along with clinical and laboratory variables, which track the function of multiple organ systems [13][14][15][16]. In recent decades, our knowledge of the biochemical processes underlying critical illness has considerably improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is an urgent demand for better identi cation of variables for high-risk patients. At present, the determination of ICU patient risk mainly relies on clinical judgment and severity scores (such as APACHE scores), which incorporate patients' previous health statuses, along with clinical and laboratory variables, which track the function of multiple organ systems [13][14][15][16]. In recent decades, our knowledge of the biochemical processes underlying critical illness has considerably improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information was gathered by a medical student who was not involved in the assessment or treatment of the patients studied. Patients' age, gender, discharge disposition, comorbidities, primary and secondary diagnoses, admission and discharge date to the MSU, EARS score, acuity score (ranges from 1 to 5, where more critical the patient's condition, the higher the level of acuity, level 1 being the highest and level 5 the lowest), and APACHE II score [11] are recorded ( Table 1). The patients' primary and secondary diagnoses were further sorted into categories for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary variables and calculation methods for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score adopted from Akavipat et al[11] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%