2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01941-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute progressive stroke with middle cerebral artery occlusion caused by idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome: a case report

Abstract: Background Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) is associated with various organ system dysfunctions. Neurologic abnormalities have been previously noted in this syndrome. Cerebral infarction secondary to occlusion of large cerebral artery is rarely reported. Here we described a patient with IHES presented progressive multiple cerebral infarctions caused by bilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion. Case presentation A 55-year-old Chinese woman presented to our hospital with acute onset of right lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chang et al [ 10 ] reported a 43-year-old male patient with HES presenting with ischemic stroke and segmental stenosis of the right posterior cerebral artery resulting from direct eosinophilic toxicity. Li et al [ 11 ] described a middle-aged woman with idiopathic HES presenting with bilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion and progressive multiple cerebral infarction. Our patient suffered from multiple arterial vascular damage involving the left common carotid artery, vertebral arteries, posterior cerebral artery, and coronary artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang et al [ 10 ] reported a 43-year-old male patient with HES presenting with ischemic stroke and segmental stenosis of the right posterior cerebral artery resulting from direct eosinophilic toxicity. Li et al [ 11 ] described a middle-aged woman with idiopathic HES presenting with bilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion and progressive multiple cerebral infarction. Our patient suffered from multiple arterial vascular damage involving the left common carotid artery, vertebral arteries, posterior cerebral artery, and coronary artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report three patients with stroke as presenting symptom of hypereosinophilia from three different causes, two of them fulfilling the criteria for HES. The pathophysiological mechanisms of stroke in the context of hypereosinophilia may produce a composite pattern on neuroimaging studies, ranging from a large vessel occlusion (or territorial) pattern [8] to multiple scattered lesions in several different vascular territories, and in particular in border zones [5,6,9,11]. These last ones may be considered a hallmark of HESrelated stroke, in particular without evidence of hemodynamic unfavorable conditions, being caused by a direct toxic effect of the increased number of circulating eosinophils to the endothelium of small cerebral vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurologic involvement is not uncommon in HES and it typically consists in peripheral neuropathy, encephalopathy, and stroke [3]. Previous reports of stroke in the context of HES involved either large vessel occlusion (or territorial) pattern and border zone pattern; the pathophysiological mechanisms, even if not completely understood, might be related to hypercoagulable state, probably due to the cytotoxic effect of eosinophil-produced mediators and subsequent endothelial damage and thromboembolism caused by cardiac involvement [4,5,6,7,8,9]. In this setting we report three cases of ischemic lesions as the first main clinical expression of different types of HES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intracardial thrombus was found in 25% of patients, which on its own does not explain the border zone distribution of ischemia. Several mechanisms were proposed to cause ischemia in HES patients, namely direct eosinophile-induced endothelial toxicity and subsequent local thrombogenicity [ 6 ], eosinophilic vasculitis [ 7 ], prothrombotic state and hypercoagulability [ 8 ], and/or cardiac microembolism [ 9 ]. An interesting mechanism which may explain the border zone pattern was proposed by Aida et al [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%