Acute Responses to On-Court Repeated-Sprint Training Performed With Blood Flow Restriction Versus Systemic Hypoxia in Elite Badminton Athletes

Sánchez‐Martínez, Guillermo; Torrontegi, Elaia; Vázquez-Carrión, Javier; González, Manuela; Montalvo, Zigor; Millet, Grégoire P.

doi:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0878

Cited by 17 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The 52 studies included a total of 1133 participants. Sample sizes, excluding the one individual case study, ranged from n = 8 25,30 to n = 137 31 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other populations included resistance‐trained adults, adults with musculoskeletal or soft tissue injuries, older adults, or adults with hypertension. There were far more studies (26 of 52) examining only male participants, 17,24,25,30,32‐38,41‐43,46,48,50‐59 compared with just 8 of 52 examining only female participants, 40,49,60‐65 leaving 18 studies examining both of these genders 8,19,20,39,44,45,47,66‐75 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most studies employed traditional upper or lower body resistance exercise protocols, commonly utilizing elbow flexion, leg press, or knee extension exercises. Only six studies employed aerobic or alternative exercise protocols, namely cycling, 37 walking, 8,46 repeated sprint training, 30 and water aerobics 64,65 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sixteen of the 52 included studies applied multiple different cuff pressures as a means of comparing acute responses or chronic adaptations to different applied pressures 17,20,31,32,36,39,43,44,48,54,67,68,70,72,73,75 . Among the remaining 36 studies using a single individualized pressure for their application of BFR, 13 studies used 80% AOP/LOP, 24,37,40,49,50,57,61,62,64‐66,71,74 7 studies used 60% AOP/LOP, 8,33,34,38,46,52,56 5 studies used 50% AOP/LOP, 25,41,42,59,60 4 studies used 100% AOP, 47,51,58,63 4 studies used 40% AOP/LOP, 19,30,45,69 and 3 studies used 30% AOP 35,53,55 . The technique and postures used to determine each of these individualized restriction pressures was similarly variable.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Upper limb restriction was generally measured using either the radial or brachial arteries, and lower body restriction measured in one of the tibial arteries, or the popliteal artery. The posture in which assessment of occlusion pressure was conducted was not reported in 15 of the 52 included studies 24,30,32,34,35,43,47,49,51,53,58,61‐63,74 . Among those reporting participant posture during assessment, supine 17,36,37,40,42,48,50,54,56,57,59,64,65 or standing 8,19,20,31,41,44,46,52,69,70,72,73,75 were each chosen in 13 studies, and sitting was used in 11 studies 25,33,38,39,45,55,60,66‐68,71 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Is there rationale for the cuff pressures prescribed for blood flow restriction exercise? A systematic review

Clarkson

May

Warmington

2020

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Blood flow restriction exercise has increasingly broad applications among healthy and clinical populations. Ensuring the technique is applied in a safe, controlled, and beneficial way for target populations is essential. Individualized cuff pressures are a favored method for achieving this. However, there remains marked inconsistency in how individualized cuff pressures are applied. Objectives To quantify the cuff pressures used in the broader blood flow restriction exercise literature, and determine whether there is clear justification for the choice of pressure prescribed. Methods Studies were included in this review from database searches if they employed an experimental design using original data, involved either acute or chronic exercise using blood flow restriction, and they assessed limb or arterial occlusion pressure to determine an individualized cuff pressure. Methodologies of the studies were evaluated using a bespoke quality assessment tool. Results Fifty‐one studies met the inclusion criteria. Individualized cuff pressures ranged from 30% to 100% arterial occlusion pressure. Only 7 out of 52 studies attempted to justify the individualized cuff pressure applied during exercise. The mean quality rating for all studies was 11.1 ± 1.2 out of 13. Conclusions The broader blood flow restriction exercise literature uses markedly heterogeneous prescription variables despite using individualized cuff pressures. This is problematic in the absence of any clear justification for the individualized cuff pressures selected. Systematically measuring and reporting all relevant acute responses and training adaptations to the full spectrum of BFR pressures alongside increased clarity around the methodology used during blood flow restriction exercise is paramount.

show abstract

“…The 52 studies included a total of 1133 participants. Sample sizes, excluding the one individual case study, ranged from n = 8 25,30 to n = 137 31 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Is there rationale for the cuff pressures prescribed for blood flow restriction exercise? A systematic review

Clarkson

May

Warmington

2020

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated‐sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands

Mckee,

Girard,

Peiffer

et al. 2024

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the impact of continuous blood flow restriction (BFR) during repeated‐sprint exercise (RSE) on acute performance, peripheral, systemic physiological, and perceptual responses. In a randomized crossover design, 26 adult male semi‐professional and amateur team‐sport players completed two RSE sessions (3 sets of 5 × 5‐s sprints with 25 s of passive recovery and 3 min of rest) with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion; excluding during between‐set rest periods) or without (non‐BFR). Mean and peak power output were significantly lower (p < 0.001) during BFR compared to non‐BFR (dz = 0.85 and 0.77, respectively). Minimum tissue saturation index during the sprints and rest periods was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) for BFR (dz = 1.26 and 1.21, respectively). Electromyography root mean square was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) for biceps femoris and lateral gastrocnemius muscles during BFR (dz = 0.35 and 0.79, respectively), but remained unchanged for the vastus lateralis muscle in both conditions. Oxygen consumption and minute ventilation were significantly reduced (both p < 0.01) for BFR (dz = 1.46 and 0.43, respectively). Perceived limb discomfort was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for BFR (dz = 0.78). No differences (p > 0.05) in blood lactate concentration or rating of perceived exertion were observed between conditions. Blood flow‐restricted RSE reduced performance and likely increased the physiological and perceptual stimulus for the periphery with greater reliance on anaerobic glycolysis, despite comparable or decreased systemic demands.

show abstract

Muscle Oximetry in Sports Science: An Updated Systematic Review

Perrey,

Quaresima,

Ferrari

2024

Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In the last 5 years since our last systematic review, a significant number of articles have been published on the technical aspects of muscle near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), the interpretation of the signals and the benefits of using the NIRS technique to measure the physiological status of muscles and to determine the workload of working muscles. Objectives Considering the consistent number of studies on the application of muscle oximetry in sports science published over the last 5 years, the objectives of this updated systematic review were to highlight the applications of muscle oximetry in the assessment of skeletal muscle oxidative performance in sports activities and to emphasize how this technology has been applied to exercise and training over the last 5 years. In addition, some recent instrumental developments will be briefly summarized. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines were followed in a systematic fashion to search, appraise and synthesize existing literature on this topic. Electronic databases such as Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed and SPORTDiscus were searched from March 2017 up to March 2023. Potential inclusions were screened against eligibility criteria relating to recreationally trained to elite athletes, with or without training programmes, who must have assessed physiological variables monitored by commercial oximeters or NIRS instrumentation. Results Of the identified records, 191 studies regrouping 3435 participants, met the eligibility criteria. This systematic review highlighted a number of key findings in 37 domains of sport activities. Overall, NIRS information can be used as a meaningful marker of skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and can become one of the primary monitoring tools in practice in conjunction with, or in comparison with, heart rate or mechanical power indices in diverse exercise contexts and across different types of training and interventions. Conclusions Although the feasibility and success of the use of muscle oximetry in sports science is well documented, there is still a need for further instrumental development to overcome current instrumental limitations. Longitudinal studies are urgently needed to strengthen the benefits of using muscle oximetry in sports science.

show abstract

Acute Responses to On-Court Repeated-Sprint Training Performed With Blood Flow Restriction Versus Systemic Hypoxia in Elite Badminton Athletes

Cited by 17 publications

References 39 publications

Is there rationale for the cuff pressures prescribed for blood flow restriction exercise? A systematic review

Is there rationale for the cuff pressures prescribed for blood flow restriction exercise? A systematic review

Continuous blood flow restriction during repeated‐sprint exercise increases peripheral but not systemic physiological and perceptual demands

Muscle Oximetry in Sports Science: An Updated Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About