1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(98)80297-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute right ventricular dilatation: a new helical CT sign of massive pulmonary embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
76
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…CT scans were considered to show no right ventricle dysfunction if the ratio of RV/LV was 1.0 or less, moderate right ventricle dysfunction if the ratio was greater than 1.0 but less than or equal to 1.5 and severe right ventricle dysfunction if the ratio was greater than 1.5; as recommended in the literature (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT scans were considered to show no right ventricle dysfunction if the ratio of RV/LV was 1.0 or less, moderate right ventricle dysfunction if the ratio was greater than 1.0 but less than or equal to 1.5 and severe right ventricle dysfunction if the ratio was greater than 1.5; as recommended in the literature (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RV dysfunction can also be recognized on CT, e.g., by measuring the ratio of RV/LV diameters (8,9) or by volumetric measurements, that can be obtained with or without electrocardiography (ECG)-gating (69,70). Several multidetector CT studies have shown the prognostic value of RV dysfunction that may help to identify those patients at risk and may facilitate selecting therapeutic strategies (9).…”
Section: Rv Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other signs have been described, including bowing of the interventricular septum and reflux of contrast medium into the inferior vena cava (IVC) [20,21]. However, a variety of different methods for the quantitative assessment of RV dysfunction on pulmonary CTA have been proposed [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and the literature shows variable results for the prognostic power of pulmonary CTA signs of RV dysfunction to predict adverse outcomes. This variability may in part be explained by the somewhat subjective nature of diagnosing RV dysfunction on pulmonary CTA because formal criteria for es- AJR 2010; 194:1500-1506 0361-803X/10/1946-1500 © American Roentgen Ray Society A cute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with a 3-month mortality rate of up to 17.4% [1][2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%