2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.04.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction secondary to paradoxical embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Proven paradoxical systemic embolism is rare and mainly associated with stroke, while myocardial ischemia is even more uncommon. 3,4 Accordingly, the optimal management of these patients remains to be defined because fibrinolytic treatment alone does not provide better results that surgical thrombectomy without clear protective effects against possible recurrences. Our patient presented with a saddle-shaped pulmonary thrombus, pulmonary and paradoxical coronary embolism due to an atrial thrombus entrapped in a previously undiagnosed PFO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Proven paradoxical systemic embolism is rare and mainly associated with stroke, while myocardial ischemia is even more uncommon. 3,4 Accordingly, the optimal management of these patients remains to be defined because fibrinolytic treatment alone does not provide better results that surgical thrombectomy without clear protective effects against possible recurrences. Our patient presented with a saddle-shaped pulmonary thrombus, pulmonary and paradoxical coronary embolism due to an atrial thrombus entrapped in a previously undiagnosed PFO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxical coronary embolism secondary to DVT is a relatively rare phenomenon with < 50 cases of proven [5-9] and presumed [9-21] cases reported in literature based on our literature search. Paradoxical thromboembolism is proposed to have occurred if the following criteria are fulfilled [14]: 1) evidence of arterial emboli in the absence of source in the left heart; 2) identified source in the venous system; and 3) presence of a communication between the venous and arterial circulation. The diagnosis is defined as “proven” when an embolus is identified in the abnormal communication between the venous and arterial systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…впервые случай парадоксальной эмболии был описан в 1877 г. [4]. в качестве подтверждения события парадоксальной эмболии рассматриваются следующие критерии: событие артериальной эмболии при отсутствии источника в левых отделах сердца, идентификация источника в венозной системе, визуализация артерио-венозного шунта [3].…”
Section: вступлениеunclassified