2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Stress Influences Neural Circuits of Reward Processing

Abstract: People often make decisions under aversive conditions such as acute stress. Yet, less is known about the process in which acute stress can influence decision-making. A growing body of research has established that reward-related information associated with the outcomes of decisions exerts a powerful influence over the choices people make and that an extensive network of brain regions, prominently featuring the striatum, is involved in the processing of this reward-related information. Thus, an important step i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

13
136
5
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
13
136
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the present study it is possible that the unpredictable context primed defense system activation, which in turn interfered with reward processing. This is consistent with previous research demonstrating that threat processing trumps reward processing (Frewen, Dozois, Joanisse, & Neufeld, 2008), and research indicating that stress can alter dopaminergic functioning (Lemos et al, 2012) and diminish both neural sensitivity to reward (Porcelli, Lewis, & Delgado, 2012) and reward learning (Bogdan & Pizzagalli, 2006). Overall, the present study suggests that a task-irrelevant unpredictable context has the capacity to alter a neural measure of reward system functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, in the present study it is possible that the unpredictable context primed defense system activation, which in turn interfered with reward processing. This is consistent with previous research demonstrating that threat processing trumps reward processing (Frewen, Dozois, Joanisse, & Neufeld, 2008), and research indicating that stress can alter dopaminergic functioning (Lemos et al, 2012) and diminish both neural sensitivity to reward (Porcelli, Lewis, & Delgado, 2012) and reward learning (Bogdan & Pizzagalli, 2006). Overall, the present study suggests that a task-irrelevant unpredictable context has the capacity to alter a neural measure of reward system functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These results could be due to specific training of such skills by the cognitive change modules, in addition to the deactivation techniques used in training. Furthermore, Sensitivity to reward was increased after the therapy in the TG, which shows a gain against to stress by the participants, since previous studies indicate a reduced sensitivity to rewards under stress (Bogdan & Pizzagalli, 2006;Porcelli, Lewis, & Delgado, 2012). This could mean when the stress levels decrease by mean of the intervention, the responsiveness to rewards (before reduced) increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Mean salivary cortisol levels in nmol/L at baseline, after task run 1, and after task run 2 for CPAW and no stress control groups (Mean ± SEM). Adapted from Porcelli et al 27 with permission. Click here to view larger image.…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPAW has been used in a previously published study examining the influence of acute stress on neural reward processing while participants underwent functional MRI scanning 27 . Thirty-two participants (16 females, 16 males; mean age = 23.41 years, SD years = 4.07) were randomly assigned between-subjects to a CPAW or no stress control group (an arm wrap composed of towels at room temperature).…”
Section: Representative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%