2000
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1999.1906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Toxicity to Rats and Trout with a Focus on Inhalation and Aquatic Exposures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low toxicity of fenitrothion to mammals may be misleading at this point in terms of ecotoxicology and lead to extrapolation problems to aquatic species. Delistraty (2000) in a study to examine the relationships of physicochemical properties and acute toxicity endpoints of 231 chemicals in rats and trout concluded that the trout aquatic LC 50 was predicted from rat inhalation LC 50 with moderate success. Therefore such data are useful in ecological risk assessment but there are limitations and uncertainties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low toxicity of fenitrothion to mammals may be misleading at this point in terms of ecotoxicology and lead to extrapolation problems to aquatic species. Delistraty (2000) in a study to examine the relationships of physicochemical properties and acute toxicity endpoints of 231 chemicals in rats and trout concluded that the trout aquatic LC 50 was predicted from rat inhalation LC 50 with moderate success. Therefore such data are useful in ecological risk assessment but there are limitations and uncertainties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the greater number of distinct TEFs among corresponding congeners for mammals vs. fish (Tl or T2 vs. T3), mammals vs. birds (Tl or T2 vs. T4), or for fish vs. birds (T3 vs. T4) contributed to differences in soil TEQs, based on these TEF schemes (Table VI). Many of the dissimilarities in TEF schemes among various classes of receptors (i.e., mammalian, fish, bird) are likely due to phylogenetic distinctions and associated toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic variations [32]. If these toxicokinetic differences were taken into account, differences in TEFs across species and endpoints may be minimized [7].…”
Section: Tef Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolf et al (2004) observed that after establishing a lethal narcosis mechanism through the inhalation exposure route, a compound's oral toxicity can be reliably estimated. The toxicity related with the exposure routes has been observed by many people (Klaassen and Rozman 1991;Delistraty 1999Delistraty , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%