1983
DOI: 10.3109/00365598309180164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute Ureteral Colic and Fluid Intake

Abstract: In the treatment of acute ureteral colic opinions differ regarding the consequences of fluid intake. This study was undertaken to evaluate a possible relationship between fluid load and the pain. One group of patients received 3 liters of fluid intravenously, while in another group all fluids were withheld. No intergroup differences as regards pain was found after 6 hours of observation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of increase of tension, rather than the absolute value, is the main determinant of pain. 3,7,11,12 Wall tension is greater in the renal pelvis than in the ureter because of the larger radius of the renal pelvis. Consequently, pain is often felt in the flank, even with distal ureteric calculi.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rate of increase of tension, rather than the absolute value, is the main determinant of pain. 3,7,11,12 Wall tension is greater in the renal pelvis than in the ureter because of the larger radius of the renal pelvis. Consequently, pain is often felt in the flank, even with distal ureteric calculi.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urine flow decrease as ureteric pressure rises. 3 Eventually, both renal blood flow and ureteric pressure fall, and blood flow to the contralateral kidney is increased. 4…”
Section: Epidemiology and Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was also no difference in the spontaneous stone passage rate, with 17 of 30 in the fluid deprivation group passing their stone and similarly 18 of 30 in the high fluid administration group [56]. These findings are supported by a more recent randomized trial, which compared narcotic use and stone passage rates of patients administered minimal IV hydration (20 mL/h) to patients randomized to ''forced IV hydration'' (2 L over 2 h).…”
Section: Hydrationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Fluid restriction was also prescribed in one-third of cases, despite the lack of validated eect on AARC [23,24]. Pain management in EDs remains a current practice problem, underlining the need to improve pain assessment in this context [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%