Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a prevalent cardiovascular condition and leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The management of orthopedic injuries requiring surgical fixation is particularly complex in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN). Coordinating the sequence, timing, and execution of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and orthopedic fixation requires careful consideration of the patient’s overall health, surgical risks, and recovery potential. Case presentation: A 55-year-old male presented with a right distal tibial fracture following a fall. His medical history included HTN, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and Kyrle’s skin disease. During his hospital stay, he was diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Severe multivessel CAD was confirmed by catheterization. After interdisciplinary consultation, simultaneous CABG and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the tibial fracture were performed. He was discharged in good condition and showed positive recovery during a one-month follow-up. Discussion: This case highlights the complexities of managing patients with multiple comorbidities who require both cardiac and orthopedic surgeries. This simultaneous approach allows for efficient treatment, leading to a shorter hospital stay and recovery period. This report supports the feasibility and benefits of simultaneous surgery in complex clinical scenarios, although further studies are required to establish broader guidelines. Conclusion: Our case emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for managing patients with multiple comorbidities who require concurrent surgical intervention. Preoperative planning and specialty coordination ensured optimal outcomes. Further research is needed to develop standardized guidelines for intraoperative care of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures.
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a prevalent cardiovascular condition and leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The management of orthopedic injuries requiring surgical fixation is particularly complex in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN). Coordinating the sequence, timing, and execution of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and orthopedic fixation requires careful consideration of the patient’s overall health, surgical risks, and recovery potential. Case presentation: A 55-year-old male presented with a right distal tibial fracture following a fall. His medical history included HTN, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and Kyrle’s skin disease. During his hospital stay, he was diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Severe multivessel CAD was confirmed by catheterization. After interdisciplinary consultation, simultaneous CABG and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the tibial fracture were performed. He was discharged in good condition and showed positive recovery during a one-month follow-up. Discussion: This case highlights the complexities of managing patients with multiple comorbidities who require both cardiac and orthopedic surgeries. This simultaneous approach allows for efficient treatment, leading to a shorter hospital stay and recovery period. This report supports the feasibility and benefits of simultaneous surgery in complex clinical scenarios, although further studies are required to establish broader guidelines. Conclusion: Our case emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for managing patients with multiple comorbidities who require concurrent surgical intervention. Preoperative planning and specialty coordination ensured optimal outcomes. Further research is needed to develop standardized guidelines for intraoperative care of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures.
Aims: This study aims to compare the outcomes of immediate (followed by closed-incision negative-pressure therapy use) versus delayed ORIF in patients with Schatzker type IV–VI TPFs. Patients and Methods: A prospective study of patients undergoing ORIF between January 2018 and December 2019 was performed. The inclusion criteria were patients (>18 years) with a closed fracture sent to the emergency room (ER) within 24 h of injury. All the patients underwent preoperative image evaluation. Two senior orthopedic trauma surgeons evaluated the soft tissue condition in the ER by 5P’s of the compartment syndrome, judging the timing of the operation of definitive ORIF. Group 1 (n = 16) received delayed ORIF. Group 2 (n = 16) received immediate ORIF and ciNPT use. Patient follow-up occurred after 2 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The assessments included the time to definitive fixation, the length of hospital stay, the time to bone union, surgical site complications, and reoperation within 12 months. A universal goniometer was used to measure the postoperative 3 m, 6 m, and 12 m ROM. Results: The patient demographics were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Group 2 displayed significantly a shorter time to definitive fixation (5.94 ± 2.02 vs. 0.61 ± 0.28, p < 0.0001) and hospital stay (14.90 ± 8/78 vs. 10.30 ± 6.78, p = 0.0016). No significant difference was observed in the time to bone union, surgical site complication incidence, and reoperation rates (p > 0.05). Flexion and flexion–extension knee ROM were demonstrated to be significantly improved in Group 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In this study, early ORIF and ciNPT use resulted in a shorter hospital length of stay, a reduced time to early active motion of the knee, and improved knee ROM. These results suggest that early ORIF with ciNPT for Schatzker type IV–VI TPFs is safe and effective in some patients. However, further research to confirm these findings across larger and more diverse populations is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.