2021
DOI: 10.5565/publmat6512104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acyclic 2-dimensional complexes and Quillen’s conjecture

Abstract: Let G be a finite group and Ap(G) be the poset of nontrivial elementary abelian p-subgroups of G. Quillen conjectured that Op(G) is nontrivial if Ap(G) is contractible. We prove that Op(G) = 1 for any group G admitting a G-invariant acyclic p-subgroup complex of dimension 2. In particular, it follows that Quillen's conjecture holds for groups of p-rank 3. We also apply this result to establish Quillen's conjecture for some particular groups not considered in the seminal work of Aschbacher-Smith.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5] Aschbacher and Smith proved that a group satisfies (Q-QC) if > 5, and whenever has a unitary component U ( ) with ≡ −1 (mod ) and odd, then (QD) holds for all -extensions of U with ≤ and ∈ Z (see Definition 3.2). In a joint work with Sadofschi Costa and Viruel [14], we proved new cases of the conjecture not included in the previously mentioned results. We worked with the integer version of the conjecture (Z-QC) and proved that it holds if K S ( ) is homotopy-equivalent to a 2-dimensional and -invariant subcomplex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In [5] Aschbacher and Smith proved that a group satisfies (Q-QC) if > 5, and whenever has a unitary component U ( ) with ≡ −1 (mod ) and odd, then (QD) holds for all -extensions of U with ≤ and ∈ Z (see Definition 3.2). In a joint work with Sadofschi Costa and Viruel [14], we proved new cases of the conjecture not included in the previously mentioned results. We worked with the integer version of the conjecture (Z-QC) and proved that it holds if K S ( ) is homotopy-equivalent to a 2-dimensional and -invariant subcomplex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…has dimension 2 (rather than the dimension 3 of A 2 ( ) itself). This can be proved by using a similar argument to that of [14,Examples 4.10 and 4.11]. Finally, Corollary 4.7 applies since K( (A 2 ( ))) is a -invariant subcomplex of K(S 2 ( )) and homotopy-equivalent to K(A 2 ( )).…”
Section: Subcase 1a = a ( )mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the last few years, there have been further developments in the Quillen conjecture [15,16,17,18]. Recently, in [18], new tools for the study of the conjecture have been provided.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%