“…The invisible-hand metaphor was first introduced by Adam Smith (Smith, 1950), and has since been read as explaining how general patterns of commerce -such as the creation of national wealth or division of labor -emerge as global patterns from the actions of individuals trying to succeed in their own local circumstances (although see Harrison, 2011;Kennedy, 2009, for the debate surrounding the historical use and misuse of this metaphor). The invisible hand was later proposed as a more general type of explanation for social phenomena (Nozick, 1974;Ullmann-Margalit, 1978), and became an important basis for subsequent thought on how macro-social phenomena might emerge.…”
Section: The Invisible Hand and Its Relation To Other Explanation Typ...mentioning
“…The invisible-hand metaphor was first introduced by Adam Smith (Smith, 1950), and has since been read as explaining how general patterns of commerce -such as the creation of national wealth or division of labor -emerge as global patterns from the actions of individuals trying to succeed in their own local circumstances (although see Harrison, 2011;Kennedy, 2009, for the debate surrounding the historical use and misuse of this metaphor). The invisible hand was later proposed as a more general type of explanation for social phenomena (Nozick, 1974;Ullmann-Margalit, 1978), and became an important basis for subsequent thought on how macro-social phenomena might emerge.…”
Section: The Invisible Hand and Its Relation To Other Explanation Typ...mentioning
“…Smith published his "Wealth of Nations" in 1776 describing how when people strived to maximize their own private benefits, society also benefited as a result. It remains unclear whether Smith, a religious person, intended the invisible hand to be a metaphor or the actual intervention of God in society (Kennedy, 2009;Rothschild, 2003). A decade before Smith, Anders Chydenius (1765), a priest in Finland/Sweden, wrote a treatise of classic liberalism arguing that economic life cannot be governed from above.…”
This manuscript identifies the hidden assumptions and simplifications that marketing academics, sociologists, and economists use when describing markets.
“…134]. А упёртые приверженцы экономического либерализма XIX в. начали ползучую реабилитацию laissez-faire выдвижением на первый план метафоры «невидимой руки», занявшей к началу XXI в. едва ли не главное место в мифологизации учения А. Смита [Kennedy, 2009].…”
Section: о понятии «классическая политическая экономия»unclassified
The article is dedicated to the anniversaries of W. Petty and A. Smith in 2023 and examines the legacy of the classics of English political economy in the context of the problem of the influence of the European Scientific Revolution of the XVII century on the British Industrial Revolution of the XVIII century. The historical significance of the heyday of British clock-making as a by-product of the Scientific Revolution of the XVII century and the prerequisites for the accumulation of human capital in England, necessary for a technological breakthrough into industrial civilization, are highlighted. Various interpretations by economists and historians of thought of the framework of classical political economy and A. Smith's attitude to the Industrial Revolution are compared. The W. Petty’s anticipation in the "Additions to the Political Arithmetic" of the role of innovative clockmaking and coal resources as British competitive advantages is noted. It is shown that the evolution of English political economy from balance-of-trade doctrine to A. Smith’s «system of natural freedom» reflected the conquest by England of the hegemonist position in the formed capitalist World-System.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.