Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1500879.1500898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptable evaluation approach for software architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider that the work presented in this paper is the first step towards a thorough analysis that could be called meta-analysis. The detection of anti-patterns is just one of the tasks that this meta-analysis should carry out, but other interesting and challenging facilities should also be provided, such as exploitation of a quality model and/or a metric model [46]. For instance, consider the importance of validating whether the architecture of the different products of a Software Product Line conform to a given reference architecture [50] [71].…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that the work presented in this paper is the first step towards a thorough analysis that could be called meta-analysis. The detection of anti-patterns is just one of the tasks that this meta-analysis should carry out, but other interesting and challenging facilities should also be provided, such as exploitation of a quality model and/or a metric model [46]. For instance, consider the importance of validating whether the architecture of the different products of a Software Product Line conform to a given reference architecture [50] [71].…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maryoly, Perez and Rojas (2003) evaluated software products using a systemic quality model. Lamouchi et al (2008) had also attempted to quantify the software quality factors by dividing the factors into criteria and sub criteria. This was done by the aid of metrics that affected the criteria.…”
Section: Background Workmentioning
confidence: 99%