2017
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00010317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptação transcultural e validade aparente e de conteúdo da versão reduzida da The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) para o Português do Brasil

Abstract: Resumo QUESTÕES METODOLÓGICAS METhodologiCAl iSSuESEste é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto (Open Access) sob a licença Creative Commons Attribution, que permite uso, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, sem restrições, desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this study was to test the factor structure of the Brazilian Portuguese TEMS (Renner et al, 2012; Moraes and Alvarenga, 2017; Sproesser et al, 2018) in confirmatory factor analysis as well as to investigate its scale reliabilities and validity. The model, including 15 motive factors and 45 items, showed a reasonable model fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The aim of this study was to test the factor structure of the Brazilian Portuguese TEMS (Renner et al, 2012; Moraes and Alvarenga, 2017; Sproesser et al, 2018) in confirmatory factor analysis as well as to investigate its scale reliabilities and validity. The model, including 15 motive factors and 45 items, showed a reasonable model fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants completed a Brazilian Portuguese version of the brief Eating Motivation Survey (Renner et al, 2012; Moraes and Alvarenga, 2017; Sproesser et al, 2018). The translation into Brazilian Portuguese was done following guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation processes (Beaton et al, 2000; Reichenheim and Moraes, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the pre-test, a minimum agreement of 90% was considered for the validation of each question, that is, if a number greater than or equal to 90% of the participants classified the question as clear, it would not need corrections, while those with percentage less than 90% would be submitted to corrections and a new round of evaluation by another group of old people 26,27 . The results of this assessment are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Expert Committee Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%