Adaptación cultural, validación y desarrollo de un cuestionario abreviado sobre el miedo a la inyección y al autoanálisis de glucosa para pacientes diabéticos

Baillo, Pilar; Laporta, Felix; Martorell, J.; González, Pablo Alonso; Rebollo, Pablo; Morís, Joaquín; Rejas, Javier; Díaz, Silvia García

doi:10.1016/s1575-0922(08)72792-x

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar to our results, a previous study demonstrated two factors, all items contributed to only one factor with factor loading exceeding .40 [10]. In another study, two factors were also obtained [30]. These results suggest that the underlying components of the Turkish D-FISQ were similar to the original D-FISQ.…”

Section: Construct and Divergent Validity Of D-fisqsupporting

confidence: 90%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric Evaluation of a Turkish Version of the Diabetes Fear of Self-injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ)

Celik

Pınar

2016

Asian Nursing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

D-FISQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire in assessing needle-prick fear among Turkish patients with diabetes. We recommend performing the Turkish D-FISQ in determining and screening patients with diabetes who have fear related to self-insulin injection and finger-prick test. Thus, health care professionals should be aware of the potential consequences of injection fear such as insulin misuse and poor self-monitoring of blood glucose, which may have unfavorable effects on optimal diabetes management.

show abstract

Section: Construct and Divergent Validity Of D-fisqsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…In our study, 2 weeks was judged to be the optimum retest interval. A study from Spain replicated our stability results (the test-retest reliability of FSI and FST was .85 and .94, respectively) in their sample after a 2-week interval [30].…”

Section: Reliability Of D-fisqsupporting

confidence: 65%

Psychometric Evaluation of a Turkish Version of the Diabetes Fear of Self-injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ)

Celik

Pınar

2016

Asian Nursing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The internal consistency estimate (i.e., Cronbach’s α) of ASAS-R-CHI was .79 in this study, which was acceptable (H. Gao et al, 2015; Nunally & Bernstein, 1994) but somewhat lower than that of the English version (.90; Sousa et al, 2010), and slightly higher than Brazilian version (.74; Stacciarini & Pace, 2014). The interitem correlations ranged from 0.30 to 0.70, except for the correlation between Items 9 and 12 ( r = .71, p < .01).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 48%

“…Taken together, the reliability analyses indicated that the ASAS-R-CHI was more similar to that of the English version than the Brazilian version of the ASAS-R. In general, the English ASAS-R has stronger internal consistency and stability than the Brazilian version (Stacciarini & Pace, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…In spite of its widespread use, some researchers have reported that the original version of the scale had a complex factor structure with few items not loading on any factor (Sousa et al, 2010). Sousa and colleagues (Sousa et al, 2010) revised the ASAS to create a more parsimonious scale, the 15-item ASAS-R, which also has a Brazilian translation (Damásio & Silvia, 2013; Stacciarini & Pace, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale–Revised (ASAS-R): Reliability and Validity Among Older Chinese People

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised (ASAS-R-CHI). A cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study, and the sample consisted of 1,219 older people, collected by a demographic questionnaire, ASAS-R-CHI and the Exercise of Self-Care Agency (ESCA) scale. The Cronbach's alpha (α) of ASAS-R-CHI was .79, the test-retest correlation was 0.95, and the item-to-total correlations ranged from r = .41 to r = .74. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) resulted in three factors that explained 65.31% of the total variance; all 15 items had strong factor loadings ranging from 0.54 to 0.91. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated the three-factor solution of ASAS-R-CHI had a good fit (x2,chi-square/degree of freedom [CMIN/DF] = 2.61, goodness of fitness index [GFI] = 0.93, adjusted goodness of fit index [AGFI] = 0.92,, comparative fit index [CFI = 0.92], Tucker Lewis index [TLI] = 0.91, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.04, root mean residual [RMR] = 0.02, P-value for test of close fit [PCLOSE] = 0.68). ASAS-R-CHI is a short, reliable, and valid instrument for measuring self-care agency among Chinese older adults.

show abstract

Instrumentos específicos de medida de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 disponibles en España

Lora

Santana

Trigueros³

2010

Medicina Clínica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adaptación cultural, validación y desarrollo de un cuestionario abreviado sobre el miedo a la inyección y al autoanálisis de glucosa para pacientes diabéticos

Cited by 4 publications

References 22 publications

Psychometric Evaluation of a Turkish Version of the Diabetes Fear of Self-injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ)

Psychometric Evaluation of a Turkish Version of the Diabetes Fear of Self-injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ)

The Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale–Revised (ASAS-R): Reliability and Validity Among Older Chinese People

Instrumentos específicos de medida de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 disponibles en España

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About