2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Ohkuma Questionnaire for Dysphagia Screening

Abstract: Introduction The Ohkuma questionnaire is a validated screening tool originally used to detect dysphagia among patients hospitalized in Japanese nursing facilities. Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of the Ohkuma questionnaire. Methods Following the steps for cross-cultural adaptation, we delivered the validated Ohkuma questionnaire to 70 patients (53 men, 17 women) who were either suffering from dysphagia or not. All of them completed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collection with objective measures in multiple community-based settings is relatively inconvenient, time consuming, and expensive for a large-scale survey; a questionnaire is a more feasible and economic option. Studies have validated that self-reporting scales for dry mouth and dysphagia provide high validity and reliability [ 22 , 39 ]. Third, because of language barriers, interviewers had to switch between Mandarin and Taiwanese, which may have caused interviewer bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data collection with objective measures in multiple community-based settings is relatively inconvenient, time consuming, and expensive for a large-scale survey; a questionnaire is a more feasible and economic option. Studies have validated that self-reporting scales for dry mouth and dysphagia provide high validity and reliability [ 22 , 39 ]. Third, because of language barriers, interviewers had to switch between Mandarin and Taiwanese, which may have caused interviewer bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dysphagia variable was measured using 15 questions in the Ohkuma questionnaire to rapidly screen the community members; examples of questions included “Do you ever have difficulty swallowing?” “Do you ever have difficulty as a result of cough up phlegm during or after a meal?” “Does it take you longer to eat a meal than it used to?” “Do you feel that it is becoming difficult to eat solid foods?” and “Do you ever have difficulty sleeping because of coughing during the night?” [ 22 ]. Possible responses were “obviously” ( frequently ), “slightly” ( sometimes ), or “no” ( never ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only if the reliability and validity of the survey tool, that is, the questionnaire, were acceptable within the scope of the research, would the survey results be deemed objective, and the reliability and accuracy of the statistics be ensured [2]. Before the data were statistically analysed, it was very necessary to analyse the reliability and validity of the construction of the questionnaire, by calculation of the correlation coefficient [3] and Krumbach coefficient [4], factor analysis [5] and other methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived dysphagia, which was defined as a subjective perception of difficulty in swallowing, was evaluated using the swallowing screening scale developed by Ohkuma, 26 and this scale exhibited internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .85. Examples of the questions on this scale are 'Do you ever have difficulty swallowing?'…”
Section: Perceived Dysphagiamentioning
confidence: 99%