Adaptation and study of the measurement properties of a sleep questionnaire for infants and pre-school children

Cassanello, Pia; Díez-Izquierdo, Ana; Gorina, Núria; Matilla-Santander, Núria; Martínez‐Sánchez, Jose M.; Balaguer, Albert

doi:10.1016/j.anpede.2017.12.007

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1 for the full selection process). Four questionnaires were (translated) versions of the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ) [ 35 – 38 ], and three questionnaires were versions of the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) [ 39 – 41 ]. Table 2 presents the characteristics of all included questionnaires.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fourteen questionnaires were designed for multiple of the aforementioned age groups. Three questionnaires assessed sleep behavior in infants and toddlers [ 35 , 36 , 46 ]. Two questionnaires targeted both infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, of which one assessed screen behavior [ 52 ], and one physical activity and sedentary behavior [ 64 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Structural validity outcomes of both questionnaires were considered sufficient. None of the translated or culturally adapted questionnaires were evaluated on cross-cultural validity or measurement invariance [ 35 – 37 , 39 , 40 , 66 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six of these questionnaires assessed constructs of sleep [ 35 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 45 , 51 ], six assessed constructs of physical activity and/or sedentary behavior [ 52 , 53 , 56 – 59 ], and four assessed constructs of all 24-h movement behaviors [ 61 – 63 , 67 ]. Reliability of nine questionnaires was evaluated by calculating ICC [ 40 , 52 , 53 , 56 – 59 , 63 , 67 ], whereas Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated for seven questionnaires [ 35 , 37 , 39 , 45 , 51 , 61 , 62 ]. Time interval between test and retest ranged between 7 days [ 53 , 57 ] and 3 months [ 39 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0–5 years)

Arts

Gubbels

Verhoeff

et al. 2022

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Accurate proxy-report questionnaires, adapted to the child’s developmental stage, are required to monitor 24-h movement behaviors in young children, especially for large samples and low-resource settings. Objectives This review aimed to summarize available studies evaluating measurement properties of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in children aged 0–5 years. Methods Systematic literature searches were carried out in the PubMed, Embase and SPORTDiscus databases, up to January 2021. For physical activity and sedentary behavior questionnaires this is a review update, whereas for sleep questionnaires we included all relevant studies published up to now. Studies had to evaluate at least one of the measurement properties of a proxy-report questionnaire assessing at least duration and/or frequency of physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in 0- to 5-year-old children. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results Thirty-three studies were included, examining a total of 37 questionnaires. Ten questionnaires were designed for infants, two for toddlers, 11 for preschoolers, and 14 for a broader age range targeting multiple of these age groups. Twenty questionnaires assessed constructs of sleep, four assessed constructs of physical activity, two assessed screen behavior, five assessed constructs of both physical activity and sedentary behavior, and six assessed constructs of all 24-h movement behaviors. Content validity was evaluated for six questionnaires, structural validity for two, internal consistency for three, test-retest reliability for 16, measurement error for one, criterion validity for one, and construct validity for 26 questionnaires. None of the questionnaires were considered sufficiently valid and/or reliable for assessing one or more movement behaviors in 0- to 5-year-old children, and the quality of evidence was mostly low or very low. Conclusions Valid and/or reliable questionnaires assessing 24-h movement behaviors in 0- to 5-year-olds are lacking. High-quality studies are therefore required, to develop proxy-report questionnaires and evaluate their measurement properties. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020169268.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0–5 years)

Arts

Gubbels

Verhoeff

et al. 2022

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Se utilizó este cuestionario ya que, según nuestro conocimiento, no se ha desarrollado una encuesta de hábitos de sueño para menores de 3 meses. Sin embargo, BISQ corresponde a una encuesta validada en español 11 en lactantes de 3 a 30 meses con validez y fiabilidad adecuadas para la evaluación del sueño en lactantes más pequeños que en el trabajo original de Sadeh 10 . Además, se registraron factores demográficos y sociales de los padres, tales como: edad, sexo, nivel educacional de los padres, comuna de residencia y tabaquismo intradomiciliario.…”

Section: Diseño Del Estudio Y Participantesunclassified

Malos hábitos de sueño en lactantes: factor de riesgo para síndrome de muerte súbita del lactante. Estudio piloto

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La Academia Americana de Pediatría recomienda que los lactantes menores de un año duerman en posición supina para prevenir el síndrome de muerte súbita en lactantes (SMSL).Objetivo: Describir la posición en que duermen un grupo de lactantes y factores de riesgo asociados al SMSL.Sujetos y Método: Estudio piloto, prospectivo concurrente, de lactantes < 45 días de vida en control sano en Centro Médico San Joaquín UC Christus. Criterios de exclusión: prematurez (edad gestacional < 37 semanas) y patología de base (respiratorias, metabólicas, cardiológicas). Se aplicó encuesta al cuidador principal respecto a datos demográficos y hábitos de sueño, basada en encuesta BISQ (Brief Screening Questionnaire for Infant Sleep Problems) validada en español, dado la inexistencia de instrumentos para < 3 meses.Resultados: Se obtuvo muestra de 100 lactantes de edad 16,78 ± 12,88 días de vida, siendo 57% mujeres. La madre fue el principal informante (84%). El 79% de los lactantes dormían en decúbito supino, 19% lo hacía de lado y 2% en prono. El 66% dormía en cuna en habitación de los padres, 31% en la cama de los padres. El 74% se quedaban dormidos durante la alimentación.El 28% de los lactantes estaban expuestos a tabaquismo pasivo. El 91% cuidadores estaba informado sobre la posición segura de sueño, siendo el principal informante el pediatra (54%).Conclusiones: En esta muestra se encontró alto porcentaje de lactantes < 45 días que duermen en posición no segura, siendo frecuente el colecho. Es importante implementar campañas locales de prevención del SMSL que refuercen el hábito de dormir seguro.

show abstract

Association between co-sleeping in the first year of life and preschoolers´ sleep patterns

Garrido,

González-Caballero,

García

et al. 2024

Eur J Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to investigate the association between co-sleeping practiced during the first year of life and preschoolers' sleep patterns. A cross-sectional study including toddlers was designed to analyze their sleep patterns. The Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire, validated in Spanish, was used to measure sleep quality. A latent class analysis was performed to identify qualitative subgroups in the sample and explore the effects of co-sleeping. The sleep patterns of 276 children were analyzed. A total of 181 (65%) parents reported having practiced co-sleeping with their children. The latent class analysis identified a two-class solution with two different sleep patterns. One of them showed a worse quality sleep pattern, which had a significant association with having practiced co-sleeping during the first year of life, and with the fact that they were still sleeping in the parents' room, among other characteristics related to co-sleeping and parental concerns. Breastfeeding also showed association with a worse quality sleep pattern. Conclusion: Based on the present findings, co-sleeping during the first year of life appears to be associated with poor sleep patterns in young preschoolers. What is Known:• Co-sleeping shows benefits for infants and parents, mainly facilitating successful breastfeeding.• Literature on the effect of co-sleeping in lately sleep quality in children and their parents is very limited. What is New:• Co-sleeping practiced during the first year of life could be associated with a worse sleep pattern measured with BISQ-E tool.• A balance between the correct practice of co-sleeping and the achievement of a healthy sleep routine in preschool should probably be part of parents' health education.

show abstract

Adaptation and study of the measurement properties of a sleep questionnaire for infants and pre-school children

Cited by 9 publications

References 36 publications

A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0–5 years)

A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0–5 years)

Malos hábitos de sueño en lactantes: factor de riesgo para síndrome de muerte súbita del lactante. Estudio piloto

Association between co-sleeping in the first year of life and preschoolers´ sleep patterns

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About