2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0809-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and validation of the instrument Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision for medical students in primary health care

Abstract: BackgroundClinical learning takes place in complex socio-cultural environments that are workplaces for the staff and learning places for the students. In the clinical context, the students learn by active participation and in interaction with the rest of the community at the workplace. Clinical learning occurs outside the university, therefore is it important for both the university and the student that the student is given opportunities to evaluate the clinical placements with an instrument that allows evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation is that the study did not did not measure organizational/−cultural differences or the mentor-mentee relationship among the different ECE environment as evaluation predictors of ECE outcomes. Therefore, questionnaires to investigate the pedagogical atmosphere during clinical exposure [43], students’ perception of social support [44], the organization of placement [45], and “patient mix” i.e., the diversity and quality of patient contacts [46], need to be adapted in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is that the study did not did not measure organizational/−cultural differences or the mentor-mentee relationship among the different ECE environment as evaluation predictors of ECE outcomes. Therefore, questionnaires to investigate the pedagogical atmosphere during clinical exposure [43], students’ perception of social support [44], the organization of placement [45], and “patient mix” i.e., the diversity and quality of patient contacts [46], need to be adapted in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In year 2014 and 2015, all students at the SRC were asked to anonymously fill in pre-selected parts of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale (CLES + T), by the end of their clinical placement [ 14 , 15 ]. The CLES + T has demonstrated good psychometric properties including high reliability [ 15 , 16 ]. In alignment with the use of the instrument within the primary care section of the medical program, Karolinska Institutet, pre-selected sections focusing on three dimensions of the learning environment were used: Pedagogical atmosphere (items 1–9: the atmosphere at the workplace, including whether the staff was easy to approach, whether one felt comfortable at the unit, the staff’s interest in student supervision, opportunities for meaningful and multi-dimensional learning).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision (CLES) Tool has been acknowledged as a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate clinical learning environments for nursing students 7. It has been adapted in several countries and contexts including for medical students in a primary healthcare setting 8. In this context it was adapted to assess the learning environment for DF students at UCD and on clinical placements in ambulance services, GP surgeries, hospitals and military medical facilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%