2022
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2123962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and validation of the cardiovascular version of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES-CVD) to the Italian context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each item, a 7-point Likert scale also measures the self-efficacy in overcoming the obstacle (1 = not at all capable, 7 = completely capable). The ROSES has been validated with individuals with CMDs and musculoskeletal disorders (Corbière et al, 2017), as well as other populations on sick leave due to health issues (Gragnano et al, 2022). The psychometric qualities of ROSES include a good construct validity and predictive validity, as well as a good test-retest reliability (Corbière et al, 2002(Corbière et al, , 2004(Corbière et al, , 2017Gragnano et al, 2022).…”
Section: Design Data Collection and Participant Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each item, a 7-point Likert scale also measures the self-efficacy in overcoming the obstacle (1 = not at all capable, 7 = completely capable). The ROSES has been validated with individuals with CMDs and musculoskeletal disorders (Corbière et al, 2017), as well as other populations on sick leave due to health issues (Gragnano et al, 2022). The psychometric qualities of ROSES include a good construct validity and predictive validity, as well as a good test-retest reliability (Corbière et al, 2002(Corbière et al, , 2004(Corbière et al, , 2017Gragnano et al, 2022).…”
Section: Design Data Collection and Participant Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%