2021
DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation and validation of the European cyberbullying intervention project questionnaire with and for Chinese adolescents

Abstract: Cyberbullying is a new form of aggression performed via information and communications technologies to inflict harm or discomfort on others (Slonje et al., 2013). It is also an intentional act of intimidation carried out using electronic media, which creates an imbalance of power between the bullies and their victims (Olweus, 2012;Smith, 2015). Cyberbullying takes a variety of different forms, such as sending insulting, rude or threatening messages, spreading rumours about someone on the internet, extracting, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to calculate the prevalence of cyberbullying, cyber‐victims were identified as those with scores equal to or higher than 1 in any of the items of cyber‐victimisation; cyber‐aggressors are those subjects with scores equal to or higher than 1 in any of the items of cyber‐aggression. The Chinese version of the cyber‐victimisation scale of the ECIPQ questionnaire (Zhu et al, 2021) exhibits satisfactory reliability in the current study (Cronbach's α = 0.97).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In order to calculate the prevalence of cyberbullying, cyber‐victims were identified as those with scores equal to or higher than 1 in any of the items of cyber‐victimisation; cyber‐aggressors are those subjects with scores equal to or higher than 1 in any of the items of cyber‐aggression. The Chinese version of the cyber‐victimisation scale of the ECIPQ questionnaire (Zhu et al, 2021) exhibits satisfactory reliability in the current study (Cronbach's α = 0.97).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The original scale has a total of 22 items, and after translation and adjustment, it contains a total of 14 items, including two dimensions, which measure cyberbullying victimization (e.g., “Someone sent me threatening or harassing messages via SMS or social media.”) and cyberbullying perpetration (e.g., “I have published inflammatory rumors that have damaged others’ reputations.”), respectively. This scale has been validated locally among Chinese adolescents, showing good validity and reliability ( Zhu et al, 2021 ). This scale uses Likert five-point scoring, 0 means “never,” 1 means “occasionally,” 2 means “sometimes,” 3 means “often,” 4 means “almost every day.” The Cronbach’α coefficient of the cyberbullying victimization scale in this study is 0.782, and the cyberbullying perpetration scale is 0.767, indicating that the scale has good reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' cyberbullying experiences were captured using the Chinese version of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (ECIPQ) (Zhu et al, 2021). The Chinese version of the ECIPQ is a 14‐item scale covering different modules of cyber‐aggression and cyber‐victimisation among children and adolescents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%