2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
313
4
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
35
313
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may be explained by the fact that the task which is associated with pain anticipation (and also pain) becomes more arousing and more active than the other tasks. 46 It may then be more difficult to switch from a dominant task towards another task, whereas repeating the dominant task may become easier. Further investigation is warranted on exactly when anticipation of pain interferes with task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may be explained by the fact that the task which is associated with pain anticipation (and also pain) becomes more arousing and more active than the other tasks. 46 It may then be more difficult to switch from a dominant task towards another task, whereas repeating the dominant task may become easier. Further investigation is warranted on exactly when anticipation of pain interferes with task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the publication of the LC-P3 theory (Nieuwenhuis et al, 2005), researchers have advanced several new accounts that build on the role of phasic LC responses in learning (Bouret & Sara, 2005;Dayan & Yu, 2006;Verguts & Notebaert, 2009). These accounts may enhance our understanding of the P3 literature.…”
Section: ) the Relationship Between The P3 And Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…increased x i and x j in Equation 1; cf. Verguts & Notebaert, 2009) may promote larger adjustments in current probabilistic beliefs, speeding learning and enhancing memory.…”
Section: ) the Relationship Between The P3 And Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is less clear is what happens when prior knowledge is incongruent with the stimuli. According to conflict monitoring theory (e.g., Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001;Verguts & Notebaert, 2009), when a stimulus or a situation involves conflict, the cognitive system allocates more attentional resources to adapt to the relevant situation, which, in turn, reduces the influence of irrelevant information. According to the predictive coding approach, stimuli are coded precisely in terms of the extent to which they violate expectations (Clark, 2013).…”
Section: The Effect Of Prior Knowledge On Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflict monitoring theory (e.g., Botvinick et al, 2001;Verguts & Notebaert, 2009) leads us to expect that the conflict between prior expectations and structural stimulus aspects in the inconsistent condition increased participants' attention to distance information, leading to greater use of distance knowledge and to greater learning of chunks that could be defined as distances.…”
Section: The Impact Of the Consistent Vs Inconsistent Knowledge Manimentioning
confidence: 99%