Adaptation in agriculture: lessons for resilience from eastern regions of New Zealand

Abstract

Assessments of adaptation in agriculture have evolved considerably from early, top-down, impact assessments. These early assessments, internationally and in New Zealand, provided a limited view of 'smart farmer' adaptation. While impact assessment provides some useful insights, experience with vulnerability and adaptation assessment provides a more appropriate foundation for understanding and characterising practical smart farmer adaptation. Findings are presented from 8 years of engagement with farmers in eastern regions of New Zealand. A comprehensive farm resilience picture has emerged from this work. This picture reflects a strong belief from real-world smart farmers that there is sufficient knowledge and experience to adapt to climate change. Proactive farmers are already reading multiple signals, including changes in climate, and are responding. The farm resilience picture provides a foundation for exploring alternative adaptation options and pathways for agriculture. These are presented and discussed in response to two proposed climate change scenarios, a high carbon world scenario and a rapidly decarbonising world scenario. Knowledge intensive, low input systems are consistent with the resilience picture drawn from farmers. Such systems are also consistent with a rapidly decarbonising world scenario and, it is argued, are likely to become increasingly attractive under a high carbon world scenario. A smart farming approach, focused on resilience, provides the basis for development of a response capacity, with potentially significant co-benefits in terms of adaptation and mitigation to climate change. Wider issues and needs to support the further development of farm resilience, and more widely landscape or regional resilience, are identified and discussed. It is apparent from this work that ongoing engagement with smart farmers, focused on resilience, can contribute significantly to development of a coordinated 'bottom up' and 'top down' response capacity. Addressing the psychology of change is a fundamental need to ensure wider engagement.

Climate‐change effects and adaptation options for temperate pasture‐based dairy farming systems: a review

“…In regions where annual pasture production decreases, farmers may reduce their stocking rate as more intensive systems will find it more difficult to cope with extreme weather events, such as flooding or drought (Kenny, ). When stocking rates were reduced by 15% in five regions of NZ, modelled MS production per hectare was reduced in four of the regions under a high‐carbon scenario.…”

Towards a heuristic for assessing adaptation knowledge: impacts, implications, decisions and actions

“…eroding soils, water pollution), biosecurity incursions, changing social and market demands (e.g. the demand for sustainable products) (Kenny 2011, Cradock-Henry 2017. Some of these act as persistent pressure on enterprises, while others act as short, sharp shocks.…”

“…Drought is one of the most significant climate change related impacts for New Zealand's primary industries (Kenny 2011, Harrington et al 2014, Reisinger et al 2014. There is already evidence to suggest a close correlation between GDP and El Nino-driven drought cycles, and recent persistent dry conditions have had a marked economic impact over the last decade.…”

Market liberalisation and drought in New Zealand: A case of ‘double exposure’ for dryland sheep farmers?

“…More generally, this stage was accompanied by an increased focus on the intensity and profitability of all forms of agriculture in New Zealand (Kenny, 2011) while, aside from a developing rhetoric of sustainability with vague environmental overtones, political concern for the environmental impact of agriculture appears to have been minimal (see Burton & Wilson, 2012). As a result, this period witnessed a dramatic reduction in rural environmental quality across a range of indicators (Dodd et al, 2008) (Melyukhina, 2011).…”